You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Honda Accord
Honda Accord vs. Toyota Camry vs. Volkswagen Passat

1833 messages, Last post on Mar 12, 2009 at 7:10 AM
You are in the Honda Accord Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: fsowirles (Apr 20, 2006 1:24 am) |
|
|
Replying to: mattgg1 (Apr 20, 2006 4:34 am) Buying hybrid for suburban commuting is not. And W8 Passat. It is 4 liter and AWD, what did you expect? Krzys |
|
|
|
| I like the passat over the camry and accord but want to get a nav system and I've read mixed reviews. Anyone have an opinion on the passat nav system? Thanks | |
| I appreciate the comparisons of Honda to VW, but I am also considering the Acura TSX - any comments or opinoins? | |
|
Replying to: canaanman (May 15, 2006 12:12 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: canaanman (May 15, 2006 12:12 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (May 16, 2006 11:46 am) OTOH, if you are recommending using the existing discussions that include any of the vehicles canaanman mentions for research, I wholeheartedly agree. It's just that we don't need to "untrack" any of the existing ones.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: pat (May 16, 2006 3:11 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: lawguy661 (Apr 19, 2006 2:57 pm) Was the mileage really that bad? I have been looking at a 2004 W8 with the sport package and I really like it for a larger car. I currently drive a WRX wagon and I need the extra space for a growing family (wife's due in a few weeks). You said you had a 330 which is another model I've considered. Was it's mileage much better? Thanks, Jason |
|
|
I wasn in the market looking for a replacement for my trusty Honda and went with the Passat. At this point, everyone knows that the Accord and Camry will always be more reliable than the Passat, so I won't expand on that any further. As long as it is above average in reliability, it's good for me. I went with the Passat because it had a lot of safety and creature comfort features you couldn't find in the Accord or Camry - like * Power seats with Memory * Directional bi-xenon headlamps * MFD integrated NAV system * Excellent Interior layout (personal preferrence) * Excellent handling and acceleration I wasn't able to check out the Accord's NAV (they didn't have one to test drive) and I am sure it is faster than the one on the Passat, but the MFG integration was well executed. IMHO, it all boiled down to is this: * Accords are great cars. More stylish than the Camry's and more fun to drive for those who want something more than just going from A to B. The Accord has tons of great features, and has a better bang for the buck because of it - but Honda's insistance on leaving out Power Memory seats really killed the deal for me (since we use our cars interchangeably in my family). * The Camry's are a nice car - but really pedestrian. Nobody can argue their reliability, but their designs aren't going to excite anyone. Admittedly, the last time I test drove the Camry was when my wife was looking for a new car, and we were thoroughly under-impressed. The negative interior and drive irked us so much, that the Camry never made it into the short list. I got the Passat because I am still young (ROFL on that 50+ driver for Camrys comment), and I will be willing to put up with a few more repairs for a car that will ellicit a huge grin on my face when I sit in it. Just avoid the Nissan Altima - this was the first time I ever saw an automotive manufacturer using printed Wood Grain stickers for an interior. I guess Nissan's reputation for cheap interiors was very well earned.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Honda Accord
Honda Accord vs. Toyota Camry vs. Volkswagen Passat
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Accord
2010 Toyota Camry
2010 Volkswagen Passat



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats