Last post on Jun 05, 2012 at 6:22 AM
You are in the Buick Century
What is this discussion about?
Buick Century, Sedan
#130 of 482 I like my Century
Oct 04, 2000 (8:28 pm)
We just purchased a 2000 Century a few weeks ago. Let me tell you, my other car is a 1997 Camry. I like the feel of the Century better. It's more responsive in the steering wheel, it's certainly more plushy and I like the way it handles. It will go 80 before I know it and it corners nicely.
I have had the Camry for over a year but I feel fancier in the Century, and barring any unforeseen events that aren't expected, I would hope to buy another one.
My previous car was a Buick Regal, 1989. That felt ritzy too and just died at 120K on it. Buicks seem feel heavier and they coast going up hill! Which is speaking from experience with both of them. I always want a 6 cyclinder and the Camry has a 4, but still has pretty good power. But if some of you think the Buick is a plain jane then you haven't driven or ridden in a Camry. To me the Buick is plush!
The Century has now become the car that goes to important places because it looks and feels so nice. We also tested a Lumina, and that was chintzy feeling, driving and sounding compared to the Century.
Thanks for all your help out there.
#131 of 482 Century/Regal vs Gr Marquis
Oct 05, 2000 (5:07 pm)
I presently drive an old (1990) Grand Marquis - and am hoping to buy a new ride next year. The Grand Marquis is in great shape and I hope to continue adding commuter miles (134K now) for several years. Our 95 Suburban, purchased last year, is used now for the family trips and boat towing, so the new ride is for a more invigorating driving experience on my monthly biz trips from Maine to Pa and for a switch from the reliable and comfy but dated Merc.
I see some of you have experience in the Grand Marquis (hi there WWCJR) and wonder how the Century compares. Also - what's the difference in feel between the Century and Regal? I've monitored the GS postings and think I'd stay away from premium gas requirements - but the Regal LS is certainly an alternative. How did you folks decide on Century vs Regal LS?
#132 of 482 To you who asked about the Battery..
Oct 05, 2000 (7:59 pm)
My car has been checked...but nothing found....but I know the reality of the matter...Nothing teaches like experience....The battery must have been ok, if everything was checked..I have loved Buick in the past....I had a great LeSabre..that got great mileage...Maybe this is a fluke car..I hope so...but I know how my car was/is...
#133 of 482 TPKEN - Century vs Grand Marquis
Oct 08, 2000 (2:52 pm)
First, on the comparison of the Buick Century and the Mercury Grand Marquis, in my case I have them both for different reasons and needs. I tow a boat that weighs around 2500 pounds and do not want a truck or SUV for normal driving. So looked for something that is suitable for the task. Due to steep ramps (always wet) front wheel drive vehicles are not a good choice as they do not have the traction required in that case that the rear wheel drive vehicles have. For that reason about the only choices out there within reason are made by Ford. I choose the Mercury Grand Marquis with the performance and handling package for this use. Without the performance and handling package these cars tend to drift around on the highway with a disconnected feel for the road. That is all solved with the performance and handling package. I handles great and on twisting roads feels like it is on railroad tracks, much better handling than both of our Buick Centurys. I have had this car for not quite a year and a half and have driven it almost 36,000 miles. It has not had any problems so the quality of build has to be rated as excellent.
With that said I do not feel that the quality of the materials for the interior trim that Ford uses in these cars is up to the same standards as that used in the Buick Century. The Buick Century is a very good value and gets great gas mileage. My wife drives a lot with her work. She drove the first one 70,000 miles in two years, we still have it and my son in college now drives it. It has not had any problems other than a power window that has stuck at times, and a windshield wiper motor replace under warranty.
It is to early to say how our new Century will be as we have only had it two weeks but have driven it 1,000 miles. So far the only thing that we have found is a minor rattle in the dash and it is the plastic trim around the instrument panel. We will have that fixed when we take it in for the first oil change in a couple of weeks.
I consider both the Grand Marquis and the Buick Century to be good cars on the highway. The Grand Marquis has more room inside and in the trunk. The Buick Century gets better gas mileage (Our mileage has been: Grand Marquis around 17-18 in town, 22-23 on the highway; Century 25 in town and 29-30 on the highway).
If you need a car for towing then I would recommend the Mercury Grand Marquis with the anti-lock brakes and traction control option in addition to the performance and handling package.
If you do not need a car for trailer towing I would go with the Buick Century, as evidenced by the cars we have bought. If you want or need a car with more room than the Century then you should consider the Buick LeSabre. It has more room, more power, and still gets about the same gas mileage as the Century.
It just all depends on your needs as to which is better. They are both cars that I would buy again, but still for the reasons that they were both bought for in the beginning. It is sort of like comparing apples and oranges. Neither is a replacement for the other and they both fill different needs. I hope that this gives you some help.
#134 of 482 Thanks WWCJR
Oct 09, 2000 (5:30 pm)
Sounds like you and I have a lot of commonality in uses/preferences. I used to use the Merc for towing my boat - about 2000 lbs - and now use the Suburban. I love the ride and comfort of my Merc even though it is the old body style. That P&H suspension is another intriguing feature that I need to test out someday - a lot of Grand Marquis & Crown Vic owners seem to love it. I see that Ford is planning new sheetmetal for those cars (2003 I think?) Can't wait to see some spy shots of what they'll look like.
Did you happen to check out the Regal LS before buying the Century? If so - what's your take on the comparison of those two cars? I drove a 97 GS recently - very impressive - but that premium fuel requirement is disqualifier for me. One of the reasons for getting another vehicle is to add something to the stable that gets 30 mpg on trips - and can still seat the 3 kids if needed.
BTW - where do you live? South Coastal Maine here.
Thanks for the note
#135 of 482 TPKEN - Followup
Oct 10, 2000 (3:29 am)
Yes, we do seen to share a lot of common needs and preferences. I live in Houston, Texas, much different driving conditions than you face. We do have a lot of wet roads to deal with. We do travel a fair amount as you can tell from the miles we put on cars. When we were looking to buy the Grand Marquis we rented one and did not like the way it handled on the road. Even my wife didn't like it and she usually doesn't know when a car does not drive good. We then test drove one with the P&H package and could tell very fast that it made a BIG difference in the handling. It also help the performance and has the air suspension so the car does not sag in the rear even when loaded down and with a trailer on it to. Mine does not have the antilock brakes or traction control but I now feel that both would be good to have. It does have great performance and is not hard to break the tires loose even on dry roads. This car car open peoples eyes with it performance as mine is equipped. It will scream but when it does the gas mileage goes straight down. I have heard that Ford going to start using the Mustang heads on the 4.6l engines in the Crown Vics and Grand Marquis which will increase the HP. If you have not already checked out topic 3207 you may want to go check it out.
When we bought our Centurys we did look at the Regals, but did not drive them as we were not really interested in them. They cost a bit more and the main differences are the engine, and the seats.
The Century would make a very good addition as a car that drives great on the highway and gets about 30 mpg on the highway. While we have usually than the Grand Marquis on the longer trips the Century is quite comfortable on the highway. We have used it for numerous 500 mile trips in a day and have been very pleased with it.
My thinking is that if you do not plan to use the car for trailer towing since you do that with your Suburban then go with a Century or LeSabre and get better gas mileage while still having a comfortable highway car.
Oct 14, 2000 (9:38 pm)
The red strip on the door is merely a reflector. It does not light up on Centurys, some other Buicks have the door courtesy lamps but not the Century.
The battery thing, well, regardless of the performance of the battery, the car should continue to run on the alternator. I have driven GM products off a jumpstart without any battery hooked up at all let alone a dead one or one with a dead cell.
My father's 1992 Century and my mother's 1995 Century both have the four-cylinder engine and the only time the car lost power was when the sepentine belt broke. That cuts energy to the power steering, water pump, alternator, AC, everything, but the car would continue to run until it overheats, of course, every warning light on the dash came on!
I have owned a few Dodge Dynastys and I like them because when my serpentine belt broke, the water pump continued to circulate and I drove the car ALL the way home before changing the belt. Of course I had no power steering and AC but the car ran safely.
Keys...the pass-key is about $20. All you can do is have another one made, and taking it to the dealer is cheaper than a locksmith. At least it isn't $300-something like a Lexus or what have you.
The percussion noise happens in many cars, including my 1988 Century. Roll down a back window and boom. In fact I can't think of a car I have ridden in or driven that doesn't pop when you crack open a window.
#137 of 482 Century is reliable!
Oct 19, 2000 (10:39 pm)
I am new to Edmunds and while reviewing topics I saw alot of comments about the Century that I totally disagree with.
Granted every has different likes and dislikes and every vehicle made is not always the same even if they are the same model.
I just purchased my Father-in-laws 1996 Buick Century (a deal I could not refuse). It is in perfect shape with only 55K miles. He wanted a van!
This is my third Buick Century. The first was a 1985 and I sold it in 1994 with 136K miles. The only maintenance I did was replaced the tires, brakes and muffler. It ran great when I sold it but really needed a paint job.
In 1994 I bought 1993 Century that was used as a rental car by Avis. The A/C had to be repaired and refilled because a line rubbed through and let the freon out. Buick picked up the tab. I also had an exhaust gasket(donut)replaced by Buick at their cost, which was caught by their mechanic. Again the only maintenance I paid for was the tires, brakes and muffler. It now has 113K miles and runs great. The body and interior are in great shape with no rust or dents, the paint still shines.
I would like to tell you it is because I take such good care of my cars but I won't lie. I buy my cars for use and comfort. I should have a truck but don't like the comfort. I don't always change the oil or rotate the tires when I should but it gets done eventually.
When I wear out this 1996 Century, I will buy another. That is as long as they don't make too many changes. I am not crazy about the look of the 2000.
Oct 25, 2000 (7:54 pm)
Regarding the percussion noise...It doesn't just happen when I open the windows, it happens all the time the back windows are open. It sounds like there are 2 flat back tires and it hurts your ears, that's why I said I can't ever drive with the back windows open unless I am able to open a front window too, which seems to lesson the noise.
Thanks for your reponses.
>>The percussion noise happens in many cars,
including my 1988 Century. Roll down a back window and boom. In fact I can't think of a car I have ridden in or driven that doesn't pop when you crack open a window.>>
#139 of 482 Century 2000 - Heat?
Oct 25, 2000 (7:57 pm)
I don't seem to have much heat coming into the drivers side of the cabin. If I have the blower up all the way I might get a little more but I am wondering what's going to happen when it's below zero outside. I'll never warm up. Any one know what that might be? Could it be the wrong thermostat in it?
By the way, we're getting 26 mpg country, city and highway driving. That's okay to me.