Sign In Join 



Real-World Trade-In Values

38945 messages,  Last post on Dec 07, 2009 at 7:39 AM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Buying

Appraise your car get trade-in, private party, dealer retail values.


Messages Page 3880 of 3895
1
...
3877
3878
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883
...
3895
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#38788 of 38945
Re: General question on trades [lrguy44] by longislander1
Oct 28, 2009 (5:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: lrguy44 (Oct 27, 2009 7:16 pm)

Actually, dealers have probably done very well with my purchases over the years because I understand that a final price has to be fair for both parties. I know that they have to cover their costs and make a profit, and that I can't be unreasonable with my price target. I negotiate reasonably, stay polite and if I have to walk, I always shake hands with the salesperson and thank them for their time. Because of my behavior, I've sometimes gotten calls from these salespeople and I've bought cars because they got the message and were willing to take a little more off.
 
However, let's look at some of the issues:
Starting with doc fees, I've read elsewhere (not here) that these can be pure profit for the dealer. A lot of dealers will negotiate a price without telling you that the doc fee (and, sometimes, other bogus fees) will be added on later. I've been told that it's pre-printed on the form and can't be removed, essentially a message to me that I should stop negotiating further. (Of course, it can be left on the form but removed from the negotiated price of the car.) One dealer also told me that if they refunded the doc fee, they would be hit with "thousands of lawsuits" from past customers who had to pay it. After a while, you get tired of hearing this stuff. Now, I think the dealer should be paid for things like acquiring the tags, including the cost of sending someone to the motor vehicle bureau. But, from what I've seen, dealers put on those charges in addition to the doc fee.
 
Re the non-responsiveness, any company that doesn't respond to a legitimate inquiry from a potential customer doesn't deserve to get any business from that customer. Not only will I not beg for business from a non-responsive dealer (especially in these tough times); I'll also send referrals elsewhere.
 
On the best price, I can't recall a time when I've ever bought a car based on the dealer's first offered price. If it's truly a negotiation, you never offer your bottom price at the beginning. This is Negotiation 101. If you are, indeed, a dealer and you offer your best price up front, a lot of customers are going to think you're stubborn when you say you can't take off a few more dollars. Any shrewd customer would walk if they have alternative dealers and cars in their area.
 
On retail prices of used cars at dealerships, they are simply inflated. There's always room to go lower.
 
I also think it's important to understand the BS that dealers still shovel in customer's faces and why some customers go into a dealership with an adversarial attitude. Recently, in negotiating for my niece's car, I was told that, "We're not making a profit on this car. We're giving you this price to build a relationship." Later, in the business manager's office as we were signing the papers, he told us that, "I always insist that my relatives and friends take the extended warranty. I want to be sure that they're protected." These kinds of remarks insult my intelligence, but I'm so anti-dealer that I smiled and shook hands with everyone and left them with a pretty nice profit at the end of the day.
 
Finally, if you are a dealer, I'm sure you are only too happy to sell someone a car at MSRP or provide them with inflated financing if you find they haven't done their homework or can be taken for a ride. After all, you're there to get the highest price from the customer. I'm there to get the lowest price. So if you think my remarks are anti-dealer, well, you just don't get it. You won't find me in your showroom.
#38789 of 38945
Re: General question on trades [longislander1] by kirstie_h HOST
Oct 28, 2009 (9:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: longislander1 (Oct 28, 2009 5:38 am)

The conversation in here is drifting well off-topic. This discussion is for people to post and respond to requests for trade-in value estimates. If you insist on continuing this (pointless and already beaten to death) conversation, please do so in a more appropriate topic.
#38790 of 38945
Re: General question on trades [longislander1] by lrguy44
Oct 28, 2009 (10:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: longislander1 (Oct 28, 2009 5:38 am)

First of all, we agree on one issue - a dealer should respond to all e-mails. We do that on a regular basis. With that in mind, only about 1% ask for a negotiated price in the e-mail. Most are just surfing or have specific questions on a vehicle. I will provide a price if asked, but if pressed for a "best price" I will give just that - my best price. I do not play games.
Your attitude in your posting is offensive to those who are professionals and in the business for many years. I guess it is the generalization that all dealers and their products are bogus is offensive. Of course it is my job (just as it may be in your business) to maximize profits - but because of the relationships built over the years much of my business (and that of most professionals) is repeat and referral. When done right the car business is like any business.
#38791 of 38945
Re: General question on trades [kirstie_h] by longislander1
Oct 28, 2009 (10:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: kirstie_h (Oct 28, 2009 9:43 am)

Thanks, Kirstie. I agree. To stay on topic, I suggest that after posters get their trade-in value on here, they read two very useful Edmunds' articles, "Confessions of a Car Salesman" and "Confessions of an Auto Finance Manager," to better understand what they might be getting into when they walk into a dealership with the trade.
#38792 of 38945
Re: General question on trades [longislander1] by volvomax
Oct 28, 2009 (1:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: longislander1 (Oct 27, 2009 1:28 pm)

Throughout this soap opera you haven't indicated what car you are trying to buy and what your trade in is.
Why don't you give us that information and we can see if you are correct on your numbers?
Contrary to your low opinion, salespeople don't get paid if they don't sell a car. If there is a way to make a sale, they will find it.
Maybe you are way off on your estimation,maybe the tone of your email was wrong, maybe you really did run into a really lazy salesperson.
#38793 of 38945
Re: 2008 Honda Civic LX [jobrien0101] by volvomax
Oct 28, 2009 (1:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jobrien0101 (Oct 26, 2009 4:18 pm)

Figure $13,000
#38794 of 38945
Re: wrecked car and trade in value [billlee] by volvomax
Oct 28, 2009 (1:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: billlee (Oct 26, 2009 7:05 pm)

Can't speak for Carmax. I believe that virtually all CPO programs state that the car cannot have frame damage. Cosmtic damage, properly repaired is ok.
If the accident is on the Carfax, most places won't want to try and retail it.
 
I'd keep after the ins co. Owning a Pontiac may make it difficult to really asses the diminished value, since the whole brand has diminshed value right now.
#38795 of 38945
Re: General question on trades [volvomax] by jayrider
Oct 28, 2009 (1:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Oct 28, 2009 1:21 pm)

volvomax --- if I have a very popular car --super pristine-- low miles-- that I have leased for almost 3 years -- still a month or two left -- buyout is 20k but retail is 23k. Hypothetically if I showed up at a dealer and wanted a new volvo suv -- would a dealer be willing to take my car in trade for 21k--payoff the note and give me 1k toward the new car?
#38796 of 38945
Re: General question on trades [jayrider] by volvomax
Oct 28, 2009 (3:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jayrider (Oct 28, 2009 1:32 pm)

Well, that depends on what the trade in is actually worth.
If the car is really worth $21k, fine. If it's not, then you are looking at an overallowance scenario. You just end up making the new car that much more expensive.
#38797 of 38945
Re: General question on trades [volvomax] by jayrider
Oct 28, 2009 (3:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: volvomax (Oct 28, 2009 3:15 pm)

Will see when the time comes. Every dealer somewhat different. Knowing your customer base - what they like and what they will pay will probably be a factor as well. Nothing to lose -- always turn it in and walk. No disposition fee on my lease papers.

Messages Page 3880 of 3895
1
...
3877
3878
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883
...
3895
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement