Sign In Join 



Ford Focus Wagon

613 messages,  Last post on Aug 09, 2009 at 8:13 PM

You are in the Ford Focus Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Ford Focus, Wagon




Messages Page 49 of 62
1
...
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
...
62
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#479 of 613
Re: warrany [lenwick] by lenwick
May 18, 2006 (1:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lenwick (May 13, 2006 5:58 pm)

I got this letter from Ford
Dear Mr. Wickens,
 
Thank you for contacting the Ford of Canada Customer Relationship
Centre. We received your message sent on 5/12/2006 regarding the warranty
on Ford vehicles.
 
It is always a pleasure to assist our customers. We thank you for your
recent inquiry. In an effort to assist you, we have researched this
matter on your behalf.
 
According to our resources, the warranty begins on the original retail
delivery date, or on the date of first use, whichever occurs first
("original warranty start date"), regardless of the km on the vehicle at
the time of purchase.
 
Mr. Wickens, if you have any other inquiries or concerns, please feel
free to contact us and we will be happy to address them.
 
Thank you for contacting Ford of Canada.
 
Sincerely,
Yves
Ford of Canada Customer Relationship Centre
[THREAD ID:1-2WD67N]
#480 of 613
Re: warrany [lenwick] by bdyment
May 19, 2006 (4:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: lenwick (May 18, 2006 1:45 pm)

Well, Ford's warranty does not appear to be as fair as the GM warranty you had noted.
#481 of 613
Re: warrany [bdyment] by lenwick
May 19, 2006 (10:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: bdyment (May 19, 2006 4:57 am)

I have never had a car that i like a much as my Focue wagon.We probably wont drive 60,000 in 3 yrs
#482 of 613
Re: Brakes- [remowus] by rapidrick
May 19, 2006 (9:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: remowus (Apr 24, 2006 8:05 am)

I also have a 03 ZTW and noisy brakes are just the way it is. They stop fine and still have plenty of pad (24,900 miles). Granted, the rotors are small and probably won't last as long as bigger ones, but so far, so good.
#483 of 613
Re: Brakes- [rapidrick] by bdyment
May 21, 2006 (6:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: rapidrick (May 19, 2006 9:16 pm)

What type of noises are your brakes making? Squealing, grinding, creaking etc. My new ZXW rear brakes have started making a squealing sound the last few feet of a stop. They are drum brakes on the rear of 2006 wagons.
#484 of 613
Re: Brakes- [bdyment] by rapidrick
May 25, 2006 (7:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bdyment (May 21, 2006 6:33 am)

What kind of noise? When they get wet and dry, the noise sounds like "grinding off the rust." Otherwise, when moving slowly and the radio's down, just a normal dissimilar material rubbing type sound, which is normal in my book. Don't hear it when moving fast and then braking. Oh, my ZTW has rear disks and I'm pretty sure they are biased toward the rears, as I get more brake dust there than on the fronts.
#485 of 613
Re: My new 2006 ZXW SES [lenwick] by lenwick
May 27, 2006 (5:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lenwick (May 17, 2006 6:27 pm)

Over 2500ks on it still getting better on hwy 401 i passed a truck started at 100ks by the time i was passed him i looked down and wow 145ks she is fast
#486 of 613
Re: Focus Wagon and Hydroplaining [hayesnem] by curbie
Jun 01, 2006 (2:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hayesnem (Dec 04, 2005 5:57 am)

I, too, have a 2004 ZTW. Mine has the 205/50-R16 tires. My Focus driving experience, along with reading as much as possible in other forums about tires, is that the factory tires (Pirelli P6000 All Season) are sub-par compared to other tires available, many of which are lower priced, when it comes time for a new set. Maybe how long a set of tires will last is as much related to one's driving habits as it is to the properties of the tires, but I got 42,000 miles out of the original tires. At about 35,000 miles I had to replace one original that had gotten a very uneven section on the tread. I had expected both better performance and longer life out of the original tires. The tires on it now are Hankook Radial K106 ($66 each on discounttiredirect.com) and are they ever a huge improvement over the originals, at least for warmer-weather driving. By winter I will be getting a full set of snow tires on old steel wheels; winter driving habits have to adapt to Minnesota conditions. And the original Pirelli P6000 All Season tires were horrible performers on ice, or in snow, especially more than 2 inches deep. A friend said the snow depth performance may well be more related to the lower profile of the tire than to the composition or tread. But those original tires were dogs in every other manner, I'd not expect them to be much more than that especially under harsher conditions.
 
My free advice: get a set of tires you can actually enjoy, as soon as possible. Life's too short for putting up with ratty tires. And having ratty tires can potentially make your or someone else's life too short besides.
 
And yes, the rear brakes on my ZTW have the classic squeal too. Unexplainable. But it does not seem to persist past about the first or second brake application of each driving day.
#487 of 613
Re: Focus Wagon and Hydroplaining [curbie] by remowus
Jun 02, 2006 (7:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: curbie (Jun 01, 2006 2:33 pm)

It seems to be a big problem for ford to have all these brakes that squeal. The squealing does seem to go away though. But it still shouldnt happen. Maybe different brake media would help.
#488 of 613
Impressions about a Focus Wagon by mikus
Jun 05, 2006 (4:12 pm)
Reply
Bought a used 2000 Focus Wagon two weeks ago. In general, I like the car, especially considering how much I payed for it. Still have some peeves.
 
The aerodynamics is not perfect. I don't know about hatchback or sedan, but driving a wagon with windows open is almost impossible. If I open driver's window it is noisy and drafty. If I open passenger window, the wind buffeting is severe. Same with rear windows. Basically all I can do is open windows at two inches at most. The air induction with cabin fan turned off is weak. So the only way to drive this car is to keep windows closed, turn on the fan and turn on air conditioning. This really sucks since I like driving with windows open. Another annoyance is wind noise in the side mirror/driver window area on speeds exceeding 80 mph.
 
The seats are relatively comfortable and elevated, this simplifies getting in and out. Back support seems ok for me, but the seat cushion is too short, this is especially noticeable when keeping foot on the brake. The cushion height can be changed, but the cushion angle cannot, I would prefer rear cushion end to be lower.
 
The rear seat is not equipped with head restraints. Ford seemed to have calculated the risk and decided that not too many adults ride in the rear seats and out of those who do, not too many get in accidents. I wonder why Ford has not been sued yet for this attitude regarding passenger safety.
 
Rear seatback splits 60/40, but the cushion is one piece, this is plain stupid. Hey Ford, if you wanted to cut costs why making a split seatback at all?
 
The steering wheel is ok. My car is equipped with cruise control which is unintuitive to operate (I owned Toyota Camry before). Also, there is little space between the wheel itself and the cruise control buttons, so using proper driving technique keeping thumbs inside the steering wheel is not easy. There is a slight vibration that is transferred from the road to steering wheel. Not very noticeable at first, but after one hour driving you notice it.
 
Power windows are not as refined as on Toyota, they produce cheap "unlubricated" glass-by-plastic sound. But the doors shut with a nice thud.
 
Rear drum brakes squeal. Well, this is a 2000 Focus, but apparently even 2004 models have this problem. Has it been fixed for 2005 onwards, after Focus was slightly redesigned? I don't know. Can anyone suggest better brake pads that do not squeal?
 
The trunk is huge but lacks hooks to tie stuff down. Toyota Matrix has a better thought-out trunk. The spare wheel in the Focus is not easy to remove and to fix it back. The accessibility of the jack is even worse. Come on, take a look at how Japanese do it. The great thing about Japanese cars is that not only frequently-used stuff is well-designed, but rarely-used stuff is well-designed too.
 
The shocks were awful, the car floated and bobbed on California freeways. This is not just my car, I test drove 2002 Focus and a brand new model as well. I must say that even with soft shocks the car drives very well, keeping the lane in turns. I replaced stock shocks and struts with KYB GR-2, much better. No bobbing anymore, but now I can feel the smallest flaw of the freeway. Well, better this than a floaty car.
 
The 2.0-liter 16-valve Zetec is powerful enough, but I guess that 2.3-liter Duratec should provide better driving experience.
 
So far I can say, that the car's body and suspension are well designed, but everything else was saved on. Cost-cutting is everywhere. The car is ok for the money I payed for it, but I would not consider buying a new Focus for 15-18 grands, nah, no sirree. I would rather get Toyota Matrix/Pontiac Vibe. Almost the same money for a new one, better resale value and better quality. I mean the build quality, parts quality and percieved quality like how different things sound or feel to touch. I hate Matrix's instrument panel, guess this is Pontiac's influence. Still, I think that a Matrix would be a better choice for a buyer of a new small hatchback/wagon.

Messages Page 49 of 62
1
...
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
...
62
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement