You are here: Forums Sedans Mercedes-Benz E-Class Mercedes E-Class Wagons (E320, E500, E55 AMG)

Mercedes E-Class Wagons (E320, E500, E55 AMG)

286 messages,  Last post on May 11, 2009 at 9:16 AM

You are in the Mercedes-Benz E-Class Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Wagon

Messages Page 27 of 29 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#259 of 286 Re: No thanks Volvo XC [w210] by blckislandguy Dec 26, 2005 (6:27 pm)
Replying to: w210 (Dec 26, 2005 4:40 am) W210, I think you'd find the current version ('01 +) far different.   But in search of deeper meaning and the answer to my question of "Why do otherwise rational people buy the E Series wagon", I consulted the MB web site. Gee, I thought that Porsche really knew how to tuck it to you with options such as "soft look leather" for $600 to replace the ordinary, non-wrestled in leather with a soft look. But MB is gaining fast.   For a mere 6k MB offers a "designo edition" which if I understand correctly offers better wood and softer leather in the cabin and a different paint job on the outside. Think about it. For 6K (yeh, I know that your bond fund has been on a 10% tear lately and the 6K will soon be $6600 if invested but if you spend it, worth perhaps 2K at trade in time) you too could have a "designo edition".
#260 of 286 No XC by w210 Dec 26, 2005 (8:31 pm)
I actually don't mind the 2001+ XC but my wife finds it not very attractive and we picked up an Audi allroad instead. The chipped Audi is much faster than the XC, I also like the fact that the all inclusive maintenace program means I don't have to worry about dealerships ripping family members off.   And the XC headrests really make me feel uncomfortable forcing my head forward, especially annoying for long trips..   I must say however, the E-class feel much more solid than both the Audi and the XC, and my E is the one with a hard suspension model (E55 sedan).   I think Porsche is still the king in killing you with options!
#261 of 286 E500 AWD wagon continuing saga by rolandthrust Dec 27, 2005 (8:42 pm)
Well the dealer just installed a new fangled Hunter alignment system that gives the closest thing to a road force balance on my brand new Conti touring (OE) tires..my third set of rubber in 24,000 miles..so far they seem to be holding up HOWEVER..was told to bring in every 2000 miles for rotation and whatever else. MBNA still insists this is "normal wear"..The Pirelli company does not!!...R Thrust
#262 of 286 press request by kirstie_h HOST Dec 29, 2005 (7:09 am)
A reporter from a national newspaper would like to speak to consumers who have purchased a high-end or high-performance wagon, such as the Audi A4 Avant, Mercedes-Benz E55, Dodge Magnum RT or the Volvo V70R, as examples . If you would to speak with the media, please respond to ctalatiedmunds.com with your daytime contact info. and city/state of residence no later than January 6, 2006.
#263 of 286 Re: front passenger seat in E500 wagon [mcolem] by gtr3 Jan 01, 2006 (3:23 pm)
Replying to: mcolem (Aug 10, 2005 2:04 am) This feature can be overridden. The override can be incremental. The service department had to spend time on the telephone, but did disable the feature after almost a day of trying. However, the passenger seat was still not going to its full rearward position. After I told them it still was not acceptable they took it back, and the next day it was fixed. Tell you service department to get on the phone to MB, and that you want full rearward travel, and that you know it can be done. Replies to this message: robm3 (Sep 14, 2006 7:08 pm)
#264 of 286 Volvo XC vs. MB E320 by mie320 Jan 17, 2006 (8:18 pm)
I have three all wheel drive wagons, a 1998 Volvo V70 XC, 2004 MB E320 4-Matic, and a 2005 BMW 325xiT. blckislandguy asks why buy an E class? There are several reasons I chose to get an E class over another XC when I gave the XC to my son. One reason is that I really didn't like how it drove. The steering on the new XC didn't feel very well connected to the road compared to the E320, and especially the 325. The steering seemed closer to our Ford Excursion than the E320 or 325. I also drove a V70 R and the steering "looseness" was gone in that car. The 1998 that I have seems to have much better steering. Secondly, the handling didn;t feel as crisp or smooth as the 325 and E320. What I mean by that is that bumps are felt more in the Volvo but at the same time it doesn't seem to handle as well. The XC also seems noisier when driving, especially during hard acceleration when the turbo 5 screams some really aweful sounds. My third reason was that the new (2001+) XC does't have good visibility for changing lanes for me. I loved my 1998 XC, and would have kept it but my son needed a car in college (colorado) and the XC is perfect for that. Overall, the Mercedes seems to be a more refined car, which it should be since it costs significantly more. The cost of maintenance should not be downplayed either. So far I havn't had to pay for anything on the Mercedes out of pocket, but the Volvo has been quite expensive to maintain. There are many 1000$ shop visits for various sensors. (ex. ABS sensor failed, about $1000 to fix) I expect the Mercedes will have similar problems once it gets more miles. I hope this helps.   Sam Replies to this message: blckislandguy (Feb 01, 2006 7:37 pm) mie320 (Feb 09, 2006 6:26 pm)
#265 of 286 Re: Volvo XC vs. MB E320 [mie320] by blckislandguy Feb 01, 2006 (7:37 pm)
Replying to: mie320 (Jan 17, 2006 8:18 pm) Mie320, without having extensively driven the E Wagon, I'll concede the noise and steering issues. I do think that the 2001+ XC (the one I am familiar with) has much better all weather capability with more traction directed up front (and, yes, one does feel some torque steer), better fogs (front and rear), more ground clearance, more load capacity, and IMHO a nicer interior especially the center stack. I won't argue if you with more experience in the E Series finds it more refined. I just don't think it is worth the upcharge of perhaps 20K (34K or so vs. 54K or so).   The service experience at MB may be more upscale. It may even be akin to the treatment at a good restaurant. I have become an expert on the mid-market service experience at Volvo and can tell you it is akin to the experience you would get at a casual dining place like Applebees: very casual and certainly not very cheap. Replies to this message: mie320 (Feb 09, 2006 6:26 pm)
#266 of 286 Re: Volvo XC vs. MB E320 [blckislandguy] by mie320 Feb 09, 2006 (6:26 pm)
Replying to: blckislandguy (Feb 01, 2006 7:37 pm) blckislandguy, some of your points are valid. However, I disagree about many of them. First, I think that the Mercedes interior is far, far better. The wood in the Mercedes is better placed and looks nicer, the leather is higher quality, and the overall appearance is nicer I think. If you are comparing to the 1996-2002 E class, then yes, the Volvo may have a nicer looking interior, but the new one is just wonderful. I can't compare the all weather traction between the E320 and the 2001+ Volvo, but the E, and even the 325xi that I have, have far better all weather traction than the 1998 Volvo XC that I have. The newer Volvo's use a Haldex AWD system I believe, and that provides better traction I'm sure. The Mercedes also has electronic stability control standard, which helps a lot on ice/snow and even rain. My Volvo only has traction control, and even that only works up to 30 mph or so. AS for the foglights, we rarely get fog here. However, I have bi-xenons on the E320 which are amazing. The amount of light they provide is better than any other headlight I have seen. They are a lot better than the bi-xenons on my 325xi, and they make my 1998 Volvo XC's look terrible (which they are). Interior space seems about equal. I havn't compared the EPA numbers, but I imagine they are a little deceiving. The E320's back end is angled fairly sharply forward, which reduces cargo space. Practically speaking, this space is rarely used, so there really isn't to much lost. On the other hand, the Volvo basically has a right angle at the back, which maximizes theoretical cargo space, but in practice that space is rarely used. As for service, they are practically the same, except I get a loaner whenever I take the Mercedes in. The dealers have the same owner (Barrier motors) and they share the same parking lot. You really can't go wrong with either car, and it's just up to each person to decide which one they like most.   Sam
#267 of 286 CDI AWD Wagon for 2007? by sullyak Mar 18, 2006 (10:03 am)
I have read about the 2007 320 CDI V6 4-matic sedan. I am very curious as to weather or not they will also be offering it in a wagon. I called MB but they couldn't tell me. Does anyone know?   Thanks.
#268 of 286 E350 Wagon; Are 2007's around the corner? by wkaiser1 Mar 20, 2006 (11:12 am)
I just returned from my dealer (MB, Manhattan). I was looking to lease a 2006 E350 NON-4matic. My salesman said there are none left in the country (well there are 8 on the west coast) I can only get a 4matic wagon and they also are in short supply. I wanted the non-4matic because it had the 7 speed automatic (4matic has only 5 speed auto) and that I do very little winter driving. Does this suggest to anyone out there that the 2006's are depleting their last inventories and the 2007's are near? Replies to this message: albell (Mar 21, 2006 5:45 am)

Messages Page 27 of 29 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Mercedes-Benz E-Class Mercedes E-Class Wagons (E320, E500, E55 AMG)