Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Wagons Volvo V70 Volvo V70 / XC70 
803 messages, Last post on Oct 30, 2006 at 4:47 PM
You are in the Volvo V70 Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
Replying to: lemonade1 (May 22, 2005 6:38 pm) Most of the issues w/ the 98 XC's were covered by recalls and upgrades. Timing belt is coming up for replacement, might want to see if that has been done. |
|
| I own a 1998 V70, and I have an issue with the interior door handles. I had problems with them opening smoothly for a while, and today when I pulled on the driver's door handle to get out of the car it just snapped, inside the door. I have to open the window and use the outside handle to get out. I need to purchase a new handle now, does anyone have recommendations for where I can get one? | |
|
I'm considering a base V70 2.4 and a base XC70 (both 2005) because there's this sell-down dealer incentive right now on base cars, and it puts them within my comfort zone, price-wise. The XC70 is only about $3k more than the V70, but my hubby is not convinced that we really need the XC70. We're also considering a 2004 Saab 9-5 linear wagon for $2k less than the V70; it has 8,000 miles on it, so I consider it practically new. So can anyone give me some great arguments on how the 2 Volvos compare? (Or how the 3 compare, if you have an opinion of the Saab?) We drive in the rain, a lot, and in the snow for ski trips about 5 times a year. We would use the car for a daily short-trip commuter, and for family trips that include 2 teenagers. The main differences I see in the 2 Volvos are: AWD, more powerful engine, electronic climate control, better seating material in the XC. Less important to me are raised suspension, roof rails, body cladding, although I do like the more burly look of the XC. Are there features I'm missing? As owners, how important are these various features to you? Also, any comments on reliability issues with 2005 models? Does the throttle problem seem to be resolved? Any issues with AWD? Thanks so much for you help!
|
|
|
|
|
Help! I have the "check engine" light come on and the message is emissions system needs servicing. Problem is the codes say the O2 sensor and fuel filter. Changed the front O2 sensor for $350.00. Light came on again in 20 miles. Put in a new fuel filter ($110.00) Light came back on in 30 miles. Where do I go next. I hate to put $1,000 of dollars in the car for nothing? Can I just turn the light off and sell the car? ( I know that woldn't be fair) but I feel like killing the light. What else could it be. The codes say we fix what was wrong. Ya right! Thanks, TJ
|
|
|
Replying to: kmcg (Jun 07, 2005 9:23 am) I know that there would be more mechanical or maintenance issues with a turbo, AWD which are standard on the XC...but I think safety aspects of the AWD as well as a slight higher stance would help with your vision as well as better protection in case of frontal or side impact. In over all reliability, Volvo is not that great. I always hear from my parents regarding "this or that" going wrong with their car. I currently own a 95 Landcruiser...nothing has gone wrong on this beast. But, I'm getting bored with the car so these Volvos may just fit the bill.... What prices are you seeing on the XC70s and V70s? Regards
|
|
|
Replying to: itrolls (Jun 07, 2005 8:42 pm) The extra power of the XC70 is offset by the extra weight of the AWD system, so power is a wash. The added complexity of a turbo engine and AWD hardware could cost extra $ down the road in maintenance and repairs. When I test drove these two vehicles last year, I didn't even notice the difference in height (4") from the drivers seat - and I seriously doubt if that extra 4" will have any effect on crash safety. If anything, the higher curb weight and center of gravity degrades handling and emergency avoidance. My opinion is that AWD is far from the panacea that many people think it is. The only time it comes into play is when you are accelerating from a stop or low speed on slippery surfaces - it has no effect on traction when you are cornering, cruising, or stopping. My V70 has hauled my family to and from the ski slopes at Snoqualmie and Mt. Rainier numerous times without a hickup - on all-season tires. Put snow tires on a V70, and you're pretty much unstoppable. Unless you frequently venture out in Northeast snow storms which demand more ground clearance, the XC70 is a waste, and then in those conditions, I'd argue that a 4WD or AWD SUV (with locking differentials) is the proper choice. No, I don't see the value in the XC70 at all. In my opinion, it's a "tweener" wagon - a wagon that is compromised on dry pavement, and inadequate in tough stuff. Just my $0.02 |
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 08, 2005 8:35 am) These are prices that seem quite low to me, especially for the XC. They come from a high volume dealership that appears to be experimenting with no-negotiation pricing on some of their cars. It works for me! I tried to get another dealer to match it, and they wouldn't. Regards, and happy car hunting! |
|
|
Replying to: kmcg (Jun 09, 2005 6:27 am) I think the XC is still the better choice. It looks better than v70 and the AWD does make a difference...even if it isn't black ice or snow, the AWD gives you better handling and control in rain or on off road conditions. The additional height and clearance of the XC changes the point of contact with another sedan in the event of a collision (lower the point of contact on your car is safer for you). For example, if a nissan 300 zx t-bones you in the xc, the point of contact is where the full metal body panel can protect you...If you t-boned the nissan 300 zx your fenders will crash through a weaker point in the zx. If I t-boned the zx in my landcruiser, I'll crash through the window and crush his skull.
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Volvo V70
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
