You are here:
Forums
Wagons
Chrysler PT Cruiser
Chrysler PT Cruiser (2005 and earlier) ![]()

879 messages, Last post on Oct 14, 2006 at 9:08 AM
You are in the Chrysler PT Cruiser Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
Replying to: sapan (Jun 20, 2005 5:38 am) My concern is the paint, looks like the paint job on PT is not that good, especially black car. Ours happens to be black. I happened to take a flight back sitting next to a car detailer. He told me black is the hardest to maintain (from any brand) although it does look beautiful. I don't think there is any magic finish to protect the car. Maybe get it detailed once a year (clay to remove deposits, then apply any good wax or polymer). Please keep us posted on the 5 speed manual. I had a 4 speed automatic and was disappointed with the acceleration and gas mileage, but hear very good things about the manual. You can search old test reports on the car magazine websites. Beware of invoice pricing, it is not a reliable indicator of actual selling prices. You need to look at the "factory" sticker; factory incentives; and dealer discount. I got mine much more than $2,000 below invoice (invoice was only a grand less than factory sticker) after adding up the dealer discount ($1,800) the rebate ($2,000) and the Chrysler Financial extra rebate for financing with them ($1,000). This late in the model year, you should get a great deal. Finally, word is out now on the 2006 PT Cruiser. The interior looks worse imho, the exterior changes seem neutral to me, but they are improving the sound proofing quite a bit (my PT Cruiser was plenty quiet as it was). At least you owe it to yourself to Google 2006 PT Cruiser and see what you come up with, so you don't feel let down in a couple of months when the 2006's hit the dealers. Like you, I got the PT Cruiser in lieu of a small SUV, and liked it a lot for that purpose. |
|
|
Replying to: sapan (Jun 20, 2005 5:38 am) We have had a bit of trouble with the paint in the front. We had it part of the front repainted (warranty). However, my wife drives it to work daily and her path (except in the dead of winter) has a high concentration of bugs. One would have to clean it twice a day at least to keep the bugs from becoming an integral part of the paint job. Other than that, she gets a bit over 30 mpg and it is still tight and quiet even though the roads she travels (120 miles round trip) daily are backroads and notably rough.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tcsmpsi (Jun 23, 2005 12:44 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: neoncruiser (Aug 28, 2003 12:23 am) |
|
| http://info.detnews.com/autosconsumer/autoreviews/index.cfm?id=20683 | |
|
Replying to: dansindiva (Mar 15, 2005 12:40 pm) |
|
| I live in the uk ,i have a 2002 2liter pt. I am thinking of fitting a induction kit,has someone fitted one and are they any good? | |
|
induction, yes. It is easy and it breaths easier. But you need an exhaust system to make it work like it should. If it breaths easier it needs to exhaust easier as well. Like some others here I have decided to move to better plugs and like many have installed Platinum plugs. I just got back from a road trip to Texas from California and back and got a low of 25 mpg in a head wind and holding to 80 mph to a high of 35 mpg on the flat with no head wind and 75 mph. I got my PT in 2002 and still love it. Take out the back seats and you can load a lot more into the car than I could in my old Cherokee. I have 17 inch rims and have lowered it by 2 inches in the front and 2.5 inches in the rear so it rides flat. |
|
|
Were is the battery at in a 2001 PT I need to replace it, I see were I jump it off but is that also were the battery is? I was told it is under the left fender
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Wagons
Chrysler PT Cruiser
Chrysler PT Cruiser (2005 and earlier) ![]()
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats