Chrysler PT Cruiser (2005 and earlier) - READ ONLY

879 messages,  Last post on Oct 14, 2006 at 10:08 AM

You are in the Chrysler PT Cruiser Forum.

What is this discussion about? Chrysler PT Cruiser, Wagon

#1 of 879 Utility, gas friendly, cool looks, easy on the wallet! by rex12

Mar 14, 2000 (6:03 pm)

I just drove one (loaded) leather, moonroof, cd,
16" wheels, tint, the whole 9 yards. Sticker?
$20,000! It was so damn cool!


The interior is the most versatile interior I have
ever encountered! The rear deck cover pulls out
and makes a table for tailgating parties! The back
seats fold down or can be pulled out completely.
The front passenger seat folds flat for more cargo
area!


Based on a Neon the PT gets around 30mpg!


They are coming out with a turbo soon.


Cooler than a minivan but big enough for a family.




I will buy one. You?

#2 of 879 PT Cruiser by spnx

Mar 15, 2000 (4:02 pm)

No.

#3 of 879 ! by rex12

Mar 15, 2000 (5:08 pm)

You posess a ton of insight! Congrats on a fine post!

#4 of 879 by spnx

Mar 15, 2000 (5:38 pm)

Hey, I answered your question, didn't I?

#5 of 879 spnx by spnx

Mar 15, 2000 (5:50 pm)

Oh, very well then.


No, I would not consider buying a Chrysler product because of their poor reliability records. Recent Chrysler models are notorious for peeling paint, electrical problems, failing head gaskets, drivetrain and transmission failure and a host of other design flaws.


They are poorly-engineered vehicles, and owning one will put you on intimate terms with their service department.


I shudder to think of owning any Chrysler, let alone a turbocharged model. Although the PT Cruiser may be fun to drive (for a minivan), I couldn't bring myself to overlook their terrible reputation, and I feel that if you would purchase one, well, lets just say you better get the extended warranty, and maybe buy a second car for those days when the PT Cruiser is at the shop.


#8 of 879 I see... by rex12

Mar 15, 2000 (7:26 pm)

So it is a forgone conclusion that, no matter what, a Chrysler will break down. Hmmmmm well, that's pretty trite.


I think the same sort of web sites and similar comments regarding overall craftmanship can be found for just about every manufacturer. As a matter of fact, if I go to Alldata and look it up, it seems as though they have spared no one! Mercy!


http://www.alldata.com/pro/TSB/yr.html


#9 of 879 Turbo by rex12

Mar 15, 2000 (7:27 pm)

Ya don't recall the Daytona? Shadow? GLH? etc. I don't remember CP having a major problem with turbos.

#10 of 879 by spnx

Mar 15, 2000 (7:30 pm)

No, I didn't say that.


However, statistically speaking, you're probably better off with another manufacturer.


Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement