- #1483 of 1593
-
Re: 06 GTI Questions [tabran]
by blueguydotcom
-
Mar 02, 2008 (6:24 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: tabran (Feb 29, 2008 9:26 pm)
Must be nice to 26k miles out of a set of performance tires. Dang. I'd expect 13-17k out of a set.
|
- #1484 of 1593
-
GTI Torque / turbo
by bug4
-
Mar 12, 2008 (12:19 pm)
-
|
|
I have a technical question --- I drove a 4-door 08 GTI over the weekend with the fancy paddle shifters. How on earth does that car produce so much toque and horse power? I had three adults in the car with luggage. The car had absolutely no problem cruising up relatively steep hills, at 70-80mph, without ever shifting out of high gear.......HOW???? I have a new 08 Accord and the GTI absolutely puts it to shame. I realize the GTI is probably lighter -- and maybe thats the only difference. But, the GTI acts like it has a V8 under the hood. I was SOOOOO impressed? Is it the turbo?
|
- #1485 of 1593
-
Re: GTI Torque / turbo [bug4]
by blueguydotcom
-
Mar 12, 2008 (9:40 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: bug4 (Mar 12, 2008 12:19 pm)
2.0T - two liter turbo. It produces 207 ft-lbs of torque at about 1800 rpm to 5000 rpm. An 08 Accord with a 4 cylinder makes 161 ft-lbs at 4300 rpm. The two vehicles weight is about 100-150 lbs apart.
40 ft-lbs is a big jump. That 2.0T engine is very nice...that's the reason it's in the GTI, Jetta, Passat, Eos, A4, A3, TT and upcoming Tiguan.
|
- #1486 of 1593
-
Re: GTI Torque / turbo [blueguydotcom]
by upstatedoc
-
Mar 13, 2008 (5:07 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Mar 12, 2008 9:40 pm)
Thanks for crunching the numbers blueguy, I didn't realize the two's weight were so close. It's definitely the turbo, I owned a '94 Golf w/ the naturally aspirated 2.0 liter which produced a whopping 105 hp. The two vehicles are night and day. I compare my '08 GTI to my previous '05 Acura TL when it comes to performance. The torque in the GTI is so readily available throughout the tachometer while you had to wait until around 4k rpm for the TL's grunt to kick in. I still miss sometimes the ungodly sounds the TL would make when you really wringed it out. Oh well, had to trade it for AWD due to the TL's poor snow performance.
|
- #1487 of 1593
-
Reliability of MkV GTI?
by exit123
-
Mar 14, 2008 (1:15 pm)
-
|
|
How's the reliability of the MkV GTI? I've seen some nightmare stories about VWs poor reliability. How about the DSG?
|
- #1488 of 1593
-
Re: Reliability of MkV GTI? [exit123]
by upstatedoc
-
Mar 16, 2008 (6:07 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: exit123 (Mar 14, 2008 1:15 pm)
The latest Consumer Report's ratings look pretty favorable as compared to the Mark IV. I have 600 miles on mine without a complaint! (go figure) I have the 6MT so I couldn't comment on the DSG.
|
- #1489 of 1593
-
Re: Reliability of MkV GTI? [upstatedoc]
by exit123
-
Mar 16, 2008 (9:54 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: upstatedoc (Mar 16, 2008 6:07 am)
I really like the GTI but I keep reading these horror stories about expensive repairs and poor reliability for VWs. I can just imagine spending like $3000 for clutch rebuild with 60K miles on a DSG.
|
- #1490 of 1593
-
Re: Reliability of MkV GTI? [exit123]
by verdugo
-
Mar 17, 2008 (10:12 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: exit123 (Mar 16, 2008 9:54 pm)
I thought DSG's didn't have clutches?
|
- #1491 of 1593
-
Re: Reliability of MkV GTI? [verdugo]
by blueguydotcom
-
Mar 17, 2008 (12:16 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: verdugo (Mar 17, 2008 10:12 am)
They have two.
|
- #1492 of 1593
-
Re: Reliability of MkV GTI? [exit123]
by kyfdx HOST
-
Mar 17, 2008 (1:30 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: exit123 (Mar 16, 2008 9:54 pm)
I'm guessing that repairs of the DSG will be like most automatic transmissions... They'll just swap it out for a rebuilt unit...
I don't really see them breaking down a DSG unit..
|