You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Chevrolet Metro/Geo Metro
Chevrolet/Geo Metro

1693 messages, Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 7:53 PM
You are in the Chevrolet Metro/Geo Metro Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Before you think about getting new wheels, you might want to put your money into the best possible *tires* for your current wheels. Other small cars have the same size (or smaller) wheels so I'm inclined to think it is your tires that could use a bump up. What do others think? carlady/host |
|
|
I own a '93 Metro 3-door and I agree with alext. Though it wouldn't hurt to get the best rubber you can buy, the skinny wheels simply won't put enough of it on the road. Luckily, the car's sluggish performance doesn't encourage "spirited" driving. Go for the wider wheels. BTW, count me in as a Metro enthusiast. This little car has been nothing but reliable. In five years of ownership, I have had NO troubles. I have replaced the front brakes and all four tires, and that's it. I live in northern NJ and my Metro is great for city driving and parking (just don't expect true comfort or refinement). Plus, you can fill the tank with regular for $9.00 and drive for a week. I even managed to squeeze three mountain bikes in the hatch. Question: is it possible or practical to retofit a '93 with A/C?.
|
|
| The 99 metro comes with goodyear tires stock, so there's not a whole lot more I could put in it. So, I've decided once it gets out of the shop to opt for the $600 to get new wheels. Not only will it improve handling and stopping ability, but it'll look a lot better than those ugly stock steel wheels. | |
|
Wider tire will just give you more problem like aquaplaning.Tailgating is much more dangerous,drive according to the road condition and you won't have any problem.I'm in ontario Canada,I'm driving 80 miles per day mainly on highway,on,rain or snow,and these small tire are just doing the job.I'm not trying to say here that I'm a better driver than you guys,I`M sure that we can find better tire ,but going bigger and wider,no thanks.... And IMHO a car is not loosing control....but a driver will... |
|
|
|
| Well, in response to "bigger not better," I did not lose control of the Metro.....as I stated in my original message (# 7) I was traveling the speed limit, and the bridge was nearly traffic-free at the time I was on it. I simply do not think that a CAR that loses control despite the driver obeying the rules of the road at 55 mph is a safe vehicle. In addition, prior to owning the Metro, I owned a small Nissan Sentra. I crossed the same bridge twice a day for a year in it because of my job, and was NEVER in danger of losing control. BTW, I have an impeccable driving record, so till the day I die I will insist that the METRO lost control, not me. | |
|
Jenn : L.O.L Don't get upset!!! You were probably not the only one who hitted this black ice.Do you really believe that 1/2 wider on four tire would have made any difference ? Personnally I dont think so.A bridge is the worse place to be in winter,and on black ice you can drive a semi and put yourself in trouble.So the Metro lost control....probably because where you leave they haven't put a sign at the entrance of the bridge saying that the road might be slippery below zero like we have here in Canada,so the poor little car ignoring the fact made a mistake ! Maybe 55mph was to fast on that bridge that day ? Maybe this, maybe that,so till the day I die I will insist that the DRIVER lost control,not the car. Richard You probably think that my English sucks,but it's not me......It's that frikin keyboard.....! Take care |
|
|
|
Who said anything about black ice or freezing temps? Where i live, it rarely gets below 50 degrees....the day this happened it was 80 degrees, bright, sunny, and dry.......whatever....i still think the metro is the most unsafe vehicle ever made...in fact mine is for sale right now!
|
|
|
I`m confuse,I've assumed that the slick patch was a patch of ice....Sorry about that. I'm getting worse....i can`t write and now i can`t read... I wish you good luck with your new car. Are you upset..? ;-)i hope not.... Richard p.s that bother me ,you hitted a patch of what...? |
|
|
I was just scanning these posts and I read with interest Jenn's 6/18/99 account of her causeway bridge incident. I know what she went through. There are many bridges where I live (northern NJ) and many of them are drawbridges. The surfaces of these bridges are often made of a sort of steel mesh. When I drive my Metro over these drawbridges, I feel as though I should be wearing an adult diaper because the Metro slides ALL OVER THE PLACE, regardless of my speed or the weather. I think it's a combination of the skinny tires, the car's light weight and the fact that it is vulnerable to crosswinds. Plus, the steel bed develops "tire grooves" from all the traffic, and these grooves also play havoc with the tiny wheels. They shake more than Elvis's hips. Metro drivers beware of bridges (and, for those of us in the Northeast, that tricky "grooved pavement")! |
|
| I can appreciate what you say in your post.But I drove motorcycle on this type a bridge.Not that I've enjoyed the experience,but shaking to the point of loosing control....no way.The geo is a safe car (not a Volvo of course)safe in a way that I'm driving one,since 28 months mainly on highway,snow or dry pavement,and that car is stable,maybe shaking a bit in crosswind,but never like a motorcycle.I still believe that a car cannot loose control. | |
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Chevrolet Metro/Geo Metro
Chevrolet/Geo Metro
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
1997 Geo Metro
2001 Chevrolet Metro



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats