Subaru Crew - Future Models II

22551 messages,  Last post on Apr 19, 2013 at 1:02 PM

You are in the Subaru Crew Forum.

What is this discussion about? Subaru, Sedan, Wagon, SUV

Your Community Leaders are ateixeira and rsholland.

#22433 of 22551 Re: US-spec '14 Forester [bpizzuti] by rsholland

Nov 29, 2012 (12:15 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Nov 29, 2012 8:58 am)
I think Eyesight is an option package only on top-of-the-line Touring models.
 
Bob

#22434 of 22551 Re: US-spec '14 Forester [rsholland] by bpizzuti

Nov 29, 2012 (12:41 pm)

Replying to: rsholland (Nov 29, 2012 12:15 pm)
If that's so, I'm going to need $30k for my Forester.
 
Hmm, let's see, 7 year loan plus $4k for my trade in once I pay it off....damn.

#22435 of 22551 Re: US-spec '14 Forester [bpizzuti] by rsholland

Nov 29, 2012 (12:55 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Nov 29, 2012 12:41 pm)
From one of the "At A Glance" PDF that I posted:
 
Optional for 2.5i and 2.0XT Touring
Driver Assist Technology package with
EyeSight system, Keyless Access and Start
and HID headlights.

 
The Limited and Touring models seem to have moved up-market, especially the Touring models. The XTs also have greatly benefited feature-wise from this new makeover.
 
Bob

#22436 of 22551 Re: Mazda may have one-upped Subie [bpizzuti] by ateixeira

Nov 29, 2012 (12:57 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Nov 29, 2012 10:52 am)
Saw that too. The extra power and DI would be welcome, in fact that should be the next thing on Subaru's wish list for the base Forester.
 
Surprisingly the Forester gets better fuel economy at 24/32 (vs. 24/30 both with AWD), despite being bigger.
 
I test drove a CX5 with my sister and the engine fixes the biggest issue that car had (lack of power), but not the 2nd biggest - a tight rear seat. We folded the rear seat and it hits the front seatback. You have to slide the front seat forward to fold the rear seat.
 
The last Forester was already bigger so the new Forester must be a *lot* bigger.
 
Also we should remember that's Mazda's premium engine, you have to get an upscale model and then pay extra for the 2.5l engine to replace the 2.0l.

#22437 of 22551 Re: US-spec '14 Forester [rsholland] by ateixeira

Nov 29, 2012 (1:01 pm)

Replying to: rsholland (Nov 29, 2012 12:55 pm)
I'm a bit concerned about price.
 
Then again loaded Outbacks are selling like crazy. 4 cylinder models in the 30s.

#22438 of 22551 Re: US-spec '14 Forester [rsholland] by bpizzuti

Nov 29, 2012 (1:04 pm)

Replying to: rsholland (Nov 29, 2012 12:55 pm)
I just hope we get pricing soon.

#22439 of 22551 Re: US-spec '14 Forester [bpizzuti] by ateixeira

Nov 29, 2012 (2:03 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Nov 29, 2012 1:04 pm)
I predict $35k loaded.
 
Well, $34,995.

#22440 of 22551 Re: US-spec '14 Forester [ateixeira] by rsholland

Nov 29, 2012 (2:13 pm)

Replying to: ateixeira (Nov 29, 2012 2:03 pm)
I predict an XT Touring with Eyesight to be about $2K less than a comparably-equipped Outback H6. So I think $35K will be close.
 
Bob

#22441 of 22551 Re: US-spec '14 Forester [rsholland] by bpizzuti

Nov 29, 2012 (2:30 pm)

Replying to: rsholland (Nov 29, 2012 2:13 pm)
Ouch, that's about $5k more than I was planning to spend...I just can't see myself spending more than $30k on a car...

#22442 of 22551 Re: US-spec '14 Forester [bpizzuti] by rsholland

Nov 29, 2012 (2:47 pm)

Replying to: bpizzuti (Nov 29, 2012 2:30 pm)
That's MSRP. I'm sure you can get it lower than that. $5K lower? I doubt it.
 
Bob
To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement