Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Wagons Subaru Crew Subaru Crew - Future Models II
21533 messages, Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 8:05 PM
You are in the Subaru Crew Forum. Your Host is kcram
Your Community Leaders are ateixeira and rsholland.
|
Replying to: volkov (Mar 11, 2009 8:52 am) Bob |
|
|
Replying to: volkov (Mar 11, 2009 8:52 am) If they are using the unit from the mini car, I would worry about trans longevity. Let's see if there is a tow rating for the auto trans models. If the fuel economy increase with CVT/3.6 liter is not significant over 5EAT/3.6l , there is no reason to choose a probably more costly CVT.
|
|
|
Replying to: saedave (Mar 11, 2009 10:02 am) Bob |
|
|
Replying to: saedave (Mar 11, 2009 10:02 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: volkov (Mar 11, 2009 10:13 am) Agreed, but if the CVT is the old Subaru unit designed for a very small engine and vehicle it probably can't be used with the 3.6l. If the power of the 3.6 has been increased with direct injection to 280-300 HP, the limits of the Murano's trans may even be exceeded.
|
|
With the cozy relationship with Nissan/Toyota, have any of you heard about a hybrid or diesel for these models? I think they would do very well in the US.
|
|
|
Replying to: hondaru (Mar 11, 2009 11:38 am) http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FirstDrives/articleId=131970 |
|
|
Replying to: saedave (Mar 11, 2009 10:31 am) Where did I see 30mpg? That's amazing numbers with the revised EPA rules. 2.5i of course.
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Mar 12, 2009 10:43 am) 
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Mar 12, 2009 10:43 am) From the US-spec model. Bob |
|
You are here:
Forums
Wagons Subaru Crew Subaru Crew - Future Models II
