Sign In Join 



Synthetic motor oil

8536 messages,  Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 9:34 AM

You are in the Maintenance & Repair Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Oil


Messages Page 814 of 855
1
...
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
...
855
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#8125 of 8536
Re: Mixing grades [ruking1] by jeffyscott
Jun 19, 2009 (7:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Jun 19, 2009 4:44 pm)

Yeah, I guess I should have said "problems" rather than "issues". Thanks to both of you for confirming that this will not be a problem.
#8126 of 8536
Re: Review [imidazol97] by basspro
Jun 28, 2009 (7:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jun 16, 2009 1:42 pm)

Here is my two cents, if you you need to know if the specs are close to the same,google motor oil evaluator and it lists about 800 different motor oils for review.
 
 Also if you are really curious about compatibility with the residual oil left behind by by the other brand,there is no compatibility issues.
 
 If you are truly concerned about the condition of your motor, have the old oil Exxon SF you take out analyzed, and then analyze the QC when you pull it.
 
  As a general rule (without analysis) you can go around 5,000 miles and or three months with a safe level TBN number, most of the time.
#8127 of 8536
Synlube economics rising by wtd44
Jul 27, 2009 (6:42 am)
Reply
I just bought a pair of 5 quart jugs of Mobil 1 15W-50. After a few hundred more miles on the clock, this will be my next oil change for my 2007 Triumph Rocket III. I also plan to change the oil in my 2005 Ford Escape next time to the Quaker State Q 5W-20 I bought during the "intro" sale. For the record, I got it all at Walmart. Now that the really low prices on brand name petroleum oils seem to be gone for ever, the economics of using full synthetic products with extended OCI seems appealing again.
#8128 of 8536
Re: Synlube economics rising [wtd44] by ruking1
Jul 27, 2009 (6:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: wtd44 (Jul 27, 2009 6:42 am)

Yes, I have researched the engines of interest to me and have concluded to extend OCI's from 15,000 to 20,000 miles (Mobil One 5w30,0w30) and 2 to 25,000 miles. (1. Mobil One TDT, Delvac One 5w40, 2. Total Quartz INEO 5w30 VW 507.00).
I have also researched Mobil One MB 229.1 5w40 and MObil One 5w30 VW 507.00 I might go to one or the other when my Total Quartz INEO supply runs out.
 
I have kept one 20,000 miles (Mobil One 5w20, 0w20) as the oil filter change oem recommendation is 20,000 miles also so it just seems logical to do them all together.
#8129 of 8536
Re: Synlube economics rising [ruking1] by wtd44
Jul 28, 2009 (8:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Jul 27, 2009 6:53 am)

Remarkably, Triumph calls for 10K OCIs on their 2.3 liter 3 cylinder engine in the Rocket III, provided synlube such as the recommended Mobil 1 15W-50 is used. I have run essentially 3K OCIs for the first 11K miles with quality petrolube 20W-50. In typical Euro motard style, Triumph requires separate drains for a front and a rear sump, plus a 3rd drain for the remote tank. This engine requires just "fashionably" less than 6 quarts of lube, and the overall configuration is quite automotive, except for the same-case transmission that shares lubrication with the engine. I look forward to living with 10K or longer OCIs!
#8130 of 8536
Relative Longevity by oldfarmer50
Aug 04, 2009 (2:20 pm)
Reply
OK, lets say you are an oil change fanatic and change your conventional oil every 3000 miles. (Yeah, I know you think that's too often but let's keep on track)
 
How often would you change a full synthetic to keep your fanatic level the same?
#8131 of 8536
Re: Relative Longevity [oldfarmer50] by kiawah
Aug 04, 2009 (3:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Aug 04, 2009 2:20 pm)

5K
 
I'd fit your profile. I've always done 3K w/conventional, but in the last year have started using syn 5K. Oil and filters are just soo cheap comparatively speaking, there's really no need to risk long OCI's.
#8132 of 8536
Re: Relative Longevity [kiawah] by jeffyscott
Aug 04, 2009 (7:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kiawah (Aug 04, 2009 3:38 pm)

I think 5000 miles for synthetic is more fanatical than 3000 on conventional. I'm pretty sure you should go 2x to maintain a consistent level of fanaticism.
 
As a non fanatic, as long as we are not talking about cars with turbos or anything, I figure 5000 miles is good for conventional and 10K for synthetic.
#8133 of 8536
Optimum timing by wtd44
Aug 05, 2009 (4:20 am)
Reply
10K sounds about right to me. I've always suspected that the bet is safer if you are using diester or polyol ester base synthetic.
#8134 of 8536
Jeff by sandman_6472
Aug 05, 2009 (8:36 am)
Reply
Tend to agree with you on these mileage figures...synthetic is supposed to be so good that a longer interval time surly makes sense. My local mechanic has synthetic for $44.00 which sounds pretty good and he's encouraged me to do it. That would be a once a year change interval for me since I probably won't even hit 4.5k miles driven on my car this year. My spinal issues have made me cut back on almost all non essential driving so I do it mainly to get to work and see my doctor monthly. Other family members have been doing all the other driving chores for me, which is turning out to be a great thing. Just don't feel the love of driving anymore .
 
The Sandman

Messages Page 814 of 855
1
...
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
...
855
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement