Sign In Join 



Synthetic motor oil

8536 messages,  Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 9:34 AM

You are in the Maintenance & Repair Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Oil


Messages Page 854 of 854
1
...
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#8527 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [Mr_Shiftright] by timvipond
Nov 19, 2009 (4:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 19, 2009 4:15 pm)

"I think on a sludged up engine it is a given that the oil failed --and it is pretty common knowledge that a factory warranty means a factory warranty.
  
By the same token, no store or dealer selling oil can back a warranty. Kragen is not going to put a new engine in for you, nor is an oil distributor.
  
Basicallly, if your engine fails, you're on your own to prove your case. The factory can (and usually does) tell you to either prove your case with extensive evidence or go pound sand.
 
And frankly, if I were the factory, that's probably what I'd require as well."

 
Actually, many factory warranties have paid for thousands of sludged up engine repairs because the engines were prone to sludge even when following the manufacturers recommended oils and oil change intervals. I'd provide a detailed list of years, makes, models, extended warranty information, etc., but I've been told by the host not to provide links to the AMSOIL website even if it is technical data. The vehicle manufacturers that did provide sludged up engine repairs are: Toyota, VW, Audi, Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Lexus, and Saab.
 
Of course Kragen is not going to pay for the engine if the oil failed. It would be the oil company, if their warranty covers it.
 
And if the engine fails under warranty, the vehicle manufacturer or the oil company has to prove why it is not covered in writing. The burden of proof is on the company, not the consumer.
#8528 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [timvipond] by xwesx
Nov 19, 2009 (5:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: timvipond (Nov 19, 2009 4:34 pm)

The burden of proof is on the company, not the consumer.
 
No, that is the way it *should* be. In my experience, it is actually the other way around.
 
Frankly, companies typically do a better job covering their rears in these situations than the average consumer. Combine that with them holding all the cards, and, unless the consumer has a sympathetic representative (either at a dealership or at the manufacturer), it is likely a long and challenging uphill battle. Again, it is all about the bottom line. If there is any room for doubt, it is likely to be exploited. Huge companies typically do not care about the individual consumer - they care about their reputation.
#8529 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [timvipond] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 20, 2009 (6:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: timvipond (Nov 19, 2009 4:34 pm)

You got THAT right!
 
The factories paid all right--- after a bloody, take-no-prisoners, hand-to-hand combat and a massive consumer jihad on the Internet against Toyota and VW. It is the American consumer and his doggedness that deserves credit for having those engines warrantied. And the media pitched in.
 
I was initially as guilty as the automakers on this one. I was leaning toward blaming careless owners and sensationalist journalism.
 
But you know, as the facts kept rolling in, I came to realize I was wrong and the consumers were right.
 
Sometimes automakers step up to the plate and sometimes they don't,
 
With engine sludge, they definitely did not until a gun was put to their heads.
 
And alas---- I myself have yet to see (or even hear of) a case of an oil company paying a warranty on a sludge complaint after the factory refused to. There may be one out there, but I've never seen it. I'd really like to have someone come on board who has had this experience successfully concluded.
 
Bottom line for me is this: If you want to avoid trouble, use the best quality oils and filters, and if you're really keen for it, oil analysis. And either do it yourself or watch them like a hawk when they do it. I've never lost an engine in one of my cars.
 
YOU are your best warranty. Do not expect some large entity to bail you out when you snap your fingers.
 
A SOBERING THOUGHT: On many used cars 5 to 10 years old, loss of the engine totals the car out. It's a write-off. Value of a 2000 Passat 1.8T with a blown engine? Close to nothing.
#8530 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [Mr_Shiftright] by jeffyscott
Nov 20, 2009 (6:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 20, 2009 6:32 am)

I was initially as guilty as the automakers on this one. I was leaning toward blaming careless owners and sensationalist journalism.
 
That is generally a very reasonable initial assumption, though.
#8531 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [Mr_Shiftright] by timvipond
Nov 20, 2009 (6:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 20, 2009 6:32 am)

"And alas---- I myself have yet to see (or even hear of) a case of an oil company paying a warranty on a sludge complaint after the factory refused to. There may be one out there, but I've never seen it. I'd really like to have someone come on board who has had this experience successfully concluded."
 
"YOU are your best warranty. Do not expect some large entity to bail you out when you snap your fingers."

 
AMSOIL paid a few of these claims right away and was eventually reimbursed by the auto manufacturer.
#8532 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [jeffyscott] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 20, 2009 (6:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeffyscott (Nov 20, 2009 6:49 am)

True, true. That's why whenever someone is jumping up and down about some "defect" or about a "lemon", I like to put the fire to it and test it out.
 
Most such claims will burn up in the fire of careful research, but some don't---they remain intact, suggesting that they are quite substantial.
 
I think what really put me over the edge was when engines started showing up that were heavily sludged with very low miles on them.
 
That was just too weird.
#8533 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [Mr_Shiftright] by richardson
Nov 20, 2009 (6:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 20, 2009 6:56 am)

Toyota claimed that a certain number of those sludge monsters were cars that came off of lease with about 30000 miles on them and the factory installed oil filter still on the car.
#8534 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [richardson] by mcdawgg
Nov 21, 2009 (5:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: richardson (Nov 20, 2009 6:49 pm)

Toyota claimed that a certain number of those sludge monsters were cars that came off of lease with about 30000 miles on them and the factory installed oil filter still on the car.
 
I bet anything that it true. Before Toyota went to the cartridge oil filter, the factory oil filter used a RED o-ring on the oil filter - that's how they could easily tell that the oil filter was from the factory.
 
I know 3 people with these so-called sludge-prone engines. They all had their oil changed per factory required schedule, and they had NO sludge, no problems. Two of them went slightly past 100k miles before they traded/sold them, and the third I think was just over 90k.
#8535 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [mcdawgg] by vipasynthetics
Nov 21, 2009 (8:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: mcdawgg (Nov 21, 2009 5:03 am)

Me... being in the oil change industry and having contact with many quick lube shops...it is not surprising that the filter wasnt changed...many many people who lease vehicles do not change filters but...dont even change the oil..they justt top it off with the cheapest stuff they could find and it may not be motor oil...it is anything they get their hands on...so leasing companies...and car dealers....do not try to sell me a car that is about 2 - 3 years old with 30-40 K miles on it as its been leased and not properly taken care of....and that goes for any one looking to purchase a car..make sure it wasnt leased.........
#8536 of 8536
Re: Sample of Oil Company Warranty Requirements [mcdawgg] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 21, 2009 (9:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: mcdawgg (Nov 21, 2009 5:03 am)

I think the expression "the exception proofs (tests) the rule" is what counts here. The rule might be that if you don't change the filter, the engine will sludge up. Fair enough.
 
But the exception was those cases where people did in fact change it regularly, and still got sludge.
 
And when Toyota suggested to THESE people that they were guilty, they got furious and opened up a media blitz that I think scared the hell out of Toyota.

Messages Page 854 of 854
1
...
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement