Sign In Join 



Q45 Troubles - READ ONLY

135 messages,  Last post on Jul 28, 2001 at 10:10 AM

You are in the Maintenance & Repair - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the M&R Host for directions! discussion.


Messages Page 4 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#31 of 135
smoothq by pat455
Jan 30, 2000 (12:14 am)
Have you been to our Sedans conference? That is probably the best place in Town Hall to find opinions on the merits of purchasing this car. Some folks here may chime in, but in the meantime, you can find other active discussions by keying Q45 in to the Search window on the left of the page.


Pat
Community Leader/Maintenance & Repair Conference
#32 of 135
1996 Q45 - To Buy or not to buy by dougs7
Feb 02, 2000 (4:16 am)
I as well am looking at a 28K mile 1996 Q45. I am hearing a lot of concerns re. repairs and high maintenance costs. Is this the norm or am I just seeing the 1%? My other option is an Audi A6. Comments? Thanks!
#33 of 135
by q45man
Feb 03, 2000 (4:57 pm)
The 96 was the transition year for the Q to get people used to lower power of 97. The engine contains no VVT and fixed lower duration cam timing (less torque). A 94-95 would be peppier. Watch out for AUDI in some respects the maintenance can be worse.
q45man
#34 of 135
by batkins1
Feb 03, 2000 (11:15 pm)
I just read bosco55's story and I shared everything bosco did, except I wasn't very bright and kept my car beyond warranty. I too, had the love/hate relationship with my Q45 and gave the dealer dozens of opportunities to fix the car. Then I tried to get them to work a "good deal" on trading my 94 in on a new Q..no deal; then I tried to get a "good deal" on a I30T...no deal. They wanted to give me $11K on the trade-in. My car looked like new, and they told me they could find nothing wrong with the engine, therefore the car was perfect-----$11K for a 94 with 80,000 mile..give me a break.


Well, I broke for the Lexus and Acura dealerships. Trying to business with the Lexus dealer is like trying to get reservations at Wolfgang Puck's latest resturant...IMPOSSIBLE. I decided to lease this time (should have done it on the Q). With the same "down" (0) here's the results:
ES 300 $34K car $628 mthly f/48mths 15,000 mpy
GS 300 $42K car $768 mthly f/48mths 15,000 mpy
I30 $30K car $537 mthly f/48mths 15,000 mpy
3.5RL $42K car $575 mthly f/39mths 15,000 mpy


The Lexus salesman told me the GS 300 was so much better than the 3.5RL, and that's why the mthy was $193.00 more with a 9 MONTH LONGER LEASE. What a dummy!!! A better car has a better resell and a higher residual and thus a lower payment. Money talks and B.S. walks, after I told him the truth, he didn't know what to say, he was confused. I don't do business with people who don't know their product, so I ask to speak to someone else--I got his manager. Once again,"our car (GS 300) is a much better car, and worth the extra $200 a month...get a clue, the purchase price of the cars were established. The GS 300 was $42,400 and the 3.5RL was $42,495, the expected residual made the difference.


Once I looked into the "reliability" and expected problems. I hot-footed back to the Acura dealship and ask them to please do business with me. I've had the car for 1,500 miles and I could be happier.


For all you Infiniti owners with problems...go see your local Acura dealer, they have just the answer. The only thing I miss is my service advisor, she pretty little lady with good car smarts.


"Infiniti...eat my shorts!"
#35 of 135
Does Edmunds know what its talking about? by modem
Feb 18, 2000 (6:24 am)
This is how Eds rates the 95 Q45


Safety   Insufficient Data
Reliability   8.8
Performance   8.6
Comfort   9.1
Value   5.6
Overall   Insufficient Data


Can anyone explain an 8.8 reliability rating?
If what I read here is true I will have to forget the Q as I couldn't stand that many problems.
I am looking for a nice good driving car for a big body (6'3") and havn't got the $ for more than the 95 Q45 would cost. Any good ideas much appreciated.
#36 of 135
by q45man
Feb 20, 2000 (3:48 pm)
 Lexus LS400 is slightly more reliable than 94+ Q45, but resale price is higher to reflect this. The replacement parts are comparibly priced.
The Ford Crown Vic with police options, SS chev are relatively easy to repair.
#37 of 135
94 vs 95 Q45 by q45man
Feb 21, 2000 (5:54 pm)
Since they are identical buy a 94 (no 90-93) with low mileage ($13,000)use the $3,000 difference to begin a good mainteance program (flush everything rear,trans, engine, brakes,power steering, and radiator) and get ($1,500) extended warranty and shop manual ($150). See www.deja.com alt.auto.Q45 for my treads on repairs.
#38 of 135
It's the same everywhere! by oldidr
Feb 23, 2000 (3:24 pm)
This is my first visit to this site, prompted by my quest for my next "wunderkar". I've looked at Infiniti, BMW, GS300, Jaguar "S", etc. I have been intrigued by the apparent across-the-board themes recited here re: the Q45's problems and dealing with Lexus dealers.


I had a '94 Q45, leased new for 36 months. I had to replace the brakes at 18K miles, tires at 20K, and had any number of "minor" yet annoying malfuctions. Sunroof motor burned out. Tilting side mirrors didn't tilt, etc. Fortunately, my local service manager was married to a lady I work with. I thought my problems were "unique", and therefore I'm considering another one. Seeing the many posts here re: problems, I'm not so sure.


The Lexus dealers I've met are arrogant snots; they've got a good product, know it, and expect you to beg to give them money. Not this guy. Like "batkins1", I'm now considering the Acura 3.5 RL. While it's "plain vanilla", it's pricing is very competitive and I have two friends who have it and love it.


#39 of 135
90-93 Q45 should I by rsruud
Feb 25, 2000 (7:05 pm)
I am looking at Q45's from 90-93 with/without traction control. I am comparing same year Ls400,
Acura legend and Audi. Which car has better pros/cons and why.
#40 of 135
LS400 or Acura by q45man
Feb 25, 2000 (8:46 pm)
Acura then 93 LS400 will be least expensive to maintain. Only consider 94-95 Q45. Audi always seems to have part shortages (hearsay from Audi techs). LS has bullet proof engine and trans, early power steering pump and AC evaporator problems but nothing major compared to others.

Messages Page 4 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement