Sign In Join 



Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Subaru Forester vs Hyundai Santa Fe vs Jeep Liberty vs Ford Escape vs Saturn Vue

4940 messages,  Last post on Sep 24, 2009 at 9:33 AM

You are in the Suzuki Grand Vitara/Vitara Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Hyundai Santa Fe, Jeep Liberty, Ford Escape, Suzuki Grand Vitara, Saturn VUE, SUV


Messages Page 6 of 494
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
494
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#51 of 4940
by ateixeira
Jan 23, 2001 (10:05 am)
Reply
Using those numbers, power-to-weight ratios would be:
 
Forester: 19.0 lbs per horse
Santa Fe: 20.7 "
Tibute: 17.3 "
 
Not bad, it splits the difference.
 
I wouldn't mind a bigger Forester if the weight gain was under 200 lbs, otherwise I'd keep the light and nimble current one. Weight is the enemy of handling and manueverability.
 
-juice
#52 of 4940
h6 by natescape
Jan 23, 2001 (10:39 am)
Reply
The Outback h6 is $7k more because both versions are loaded with goodies. The actual cost for the big engine is significantly less, I would guess.
 
More likely to arrive on our shores (IMO) is a turbo h4 for the Forester.
#53 of 4940
Subaru H6 goodies by ruteger
Jan 23, 2001 (1:16 pm)
Reply
You are correct. The H6 comes with a raft of things that are not included with the $7,000 less base Outback, the least of which is the automatic transmission.
 
When comparing similiarly equipped vehicles (like the Limited wagon with an auto and the H6 which comes standard with the auto), the price difference narrows down to around $2,000 between H4 and H6 equipped Subarus.
 
It would definitely be an interesting situation if a strippo H6/auto Legacy wagon were available at around an MSRP of $23,290, since a similiarly-equipped Tribute LX-V6 AWD with ABS/side airbags now goes for almost the exact same amount.
#54 of 4940
by ateixeira
Jan 23, 2001 (2:20 pm)
Reply
I'd like to see a manual trans with an $800 price drop, too. That would really go.
 
LL Beans are listing locally for $27.2k freight included. Even loaded Tributes don't have as much equipment and the real-world price is closer than you'd think.
 
-juice
#55 of 4940
LL Bean vs. ES by ruteger
Jan 24, 2001 (6:40 am)
Reply
With the present dearth of ES Tributes, and they were selling any available loaded ES Tributes (tow, LX1, ABS) at MSRP of $25,705 and comparable LL Beans at invoice of $27,764 (6-disc CD, tow hitch), and I needed to buy something *right now*, I think I'd give serious consideration to the LL Bean.
 
Any other set of circumstances would probably give the nod to the Tribute.
#56 of 4940
by ateixeira
Jan 24, 2001 (7:46 am)
Reply
The funny thing is they would not have a supply problem if they weren't recalling them and ordering stop-builds.
 
At least by now they supply/demand balance would be more in your favor.
 
Just consider an extended warranty if you get one.
 
-juice
#57 of 4940
juice by big_guy
Jan 24, 2001 (9:10 am)
Reply
Have you test driven a Tribute? It is 315 lbs heavier than the Forester but still feels pretty nimble and maneuverable even with a higher center of gravity and increased bulk. I think the Forester could gain up to 300 lbs with the increased power of the H6 and still be able to run circles around any of the other mini-utes out there. The lower center of gravity and superior AWD system really give the edge to the Forester. The Forester really needs a stretch job to make the rear seats accessible to anyone over 5'-0" tall. I love the handling of the Forester and the reliability of the Subaru engines and AWD system . . . but that back seat is just awful.
 
My needs are for a good snow vehicle with lots of head and leg room for the driver and good head and leg room for the rear passengers. I don't plan on doing any stump busting so off-road prowess is not a concern. An increase from 33" to 37" or 38" and a 1" to 2" longer rear seat would do wonders for the Forester. The Sante Fe, Forester, and Tribute have similar front seat head and leg room but the rear seat room really tells the difference. I could put 5 adults in a Tribute or Sante Fe when I am driving, but could only fit 3 adults in a Forester under the same conditions . . . I guess I could fit 5 adults in a Forester as long as two of them were very short.
 
I do agree with you about providing a manual transmission on an H6 Forester. Manual transmissions are a lot more fun, get better fuel economy, and I like the control you get with a manual tranny.
 
I still have the luxury of waiting a while before making any purchases. By the time I am ready to buy, perhaps the Tribute will have worked out all the bugs, the folks at Hyundai will have put the Sante Fe on a diet or tweaked the 3.0L V6 to produce numbers closer to the 3.0L Duratec V6, and Subaru will have found a way to stretch the Forester and add more bang under the hood with either a turbo H4 (or supercharged H4), or the 3.0L H6. That would make a decision much more difficult between these three mini-utes. As it stands right now in my book, the Tribute edges out the Sante Fe and the Forester is in third due to the awful rear seat leg room.
#58 of 4940
by ateixeira
Jan 24, 2001 (9:42 am)
Reply
No, but it's not like I haven't tried.

I saw one last Saturday at the Baltimore auto show, and was able to get inside and check it out up close. Obviously, we couldn't drive them.

Earlier, I was hoping to drive an Escape at Edmunds Live, but their DC event coincided with the steering-wheels-falling-off recall, so we didn't get to drive them. Here is a photo of the sign telling us the Escape was MIA:

http://thejuiceman.homepage.com/live.html

Note the Rodeo that got stuck on their dirt hill. Remember - the driver counts more than the vehicle does!

I have a 19 month old, so the back seat has more than enough room for us. I was more concerned with the cargo hold being able to hold strollers and the like, which is does well. If you move the front seats up a click or two, it's fine for even normal sized adults.

The Santa Fe has a 2.7l V6, actually.

I like small, nimble vehicles, so I consider than an advantage in the Forester. For extra space I have a roof top carrier by Samsonite (just $50) as well as a trailer hitch, plus a bike rack for that hitch.

That setup allows me to pack heavily for vacations, yet still have fun driving to work (and get 25mpg in the process).

-juice

#59 of 4940
Rear seat by natescape
Jan 24, 2001 (9:53 am)
Reply
I don't have a big concern about the rear seat because I have two babies who won't need tons of room for 10-15 years. I have the Forester S+.
 
But, several weeks ago 4 adults made a long drive (with a highway accident stoppage for a while) in my car and everyone had plenty of room. Two of us were 6' (me and one passenger), and the other two were 5'9" or so. Everyone had plenty of room, even when the other 6 footer sat behind me.
 
So, IMO, the rear seats are slightly cramped, but are plenty big enough for most use. Sure, if you're going to be carpooling with lumberjacks, get a huge vehicle. But if there won't be more than a couple of adults in the car at a time, you're fine. And when you DO need to put people in back, they should be at least "not uncomfortable".
#60 of 4940
by ateixeira
Jan 24, 2001 (9:56 am)
Reply
I've also taken 5-6 hour trips from DC to CT with 4 adults. I'm about 6", but the others ranged from 5'6" to 5'9", and noone complained. We had lots of luggage, too, some on the roof rack (which can carry 150 lbs).
 
Of course, I'm from Brazil, where cars tend to be tiny, so I see the Forester as a big (!) vehicle.
 
-juice

Messages Page 6 of 494
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
494
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement