You are here:
Forums
Maintenance & Repair
Tires, tires, tires
7018 messages, Last post on Mar 07, 2010 at 4:04 AM
You are in the Maintenance & Repair Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright
Edmund's Feature Article: Tire Safety: Don't Ignore the Rubber on the Road
For dedicated winter tires, also have a look at the Snow/ice winter tires discussion topic.
actually, the issue with fitting will be the width of th erim. Tires usually fit a range of widths, but it is possible the 175 might be too narrow if the 185 is the minimum width for your rims.
|
|
|
Replying to: stickguy (Oct 03, 2009 12:31 pm) If you can possibly afford it, either new tires, or near-new, factory "take-offs" would be a much safer choice. |
|
|
Replying to: stickguy (Oct 03, 2009 12:29 pm) |
|
|
I need to replace the tires on my 2003 Avalon which has ~60K miles on it. Driving is split 50/50 highway and city with the highway usually not over 80-85 mph. Can anyone recommend a couple of good alternatives? Thanks Ken |
|
|
Replying to: kkovak (Oct 29, 2009 5:46 am) 1. Michelin Primacy MXV4 2. General Altimax HP If price is an issue, item #2 is $43. cheaper per tire or -$172. per set of 4. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kkovak (Oct 29, 2009 5:46 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: mz6greyghost (Oct 29, 2009 6:57 am) THanks Ken
|
|
|
Replying to: kkovak (Oct 29, 2009 8:13 am) Also, *We don't force ourselves to drive much in snow and ice, just if caught out in it.* It only takes a few times per winter for snow and ice performance to matter...... |
|
Lately I've noticed that new concrete being laid down on interstates and highways has heavy grooves(maybe 1/4 or 1/8 inch deep) running either vertically or horizontally the full width of all lanes. I suppose this is for better traction and maybe drainage. I would think that running tires over this would shorten their life... over say concrete that hasn't been roughed up. To what degree it would shorten a tires life is a guess... maybe a couple thousand miles over the life of the tire? Also, the rougher surface seems like it would influence the mpg of cars riding on the surface, say a half a mile a gallon of gas less. It would also seem the horizontally grooved lines in the road would hinder mpg more than vertical lines. Anybody else notice this, or do I just have too much time on my hands? I know weird questions, but this discussion has been dead now for a couple months, most unusual.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jipster (Jan 07, 2010 7:35 pm) That means the grooves in the pavement aren't going to have much effect on the wear rate. 2) Rolling resistance is mostly a function of the amount of deflction that takes place in a tire. That means that grooves in the pavement aren't going to have much effect because the deflection is mostly a function of the load and pressure of the tire, and very little with the friction developed by the contact patch. 3) There is a term called "Groove Wander", also referred to as "Tramling", where the tire tends to follow the grooves in the pavement. Needless to say, cross wise grooves (grooves crossing the direction of travel) would have no effect, but grooves in the same direction of travel will line up with the grooves the tire and sometimes cause this phenomenon. Since the dsicovery of this phenomenon, most pavement grooving patterns (the width and the spacing) have been standardized enough so the tire manufacturers can space the grooves in their tires such that there isn't a noticeable problem. However, occassionally, an odd combination of pavement vs tire will occur and the phenomenon will appear. From what I have been able to tell, groove wander is the only problem will grooved pavement. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Maintenance & Repair
Tires, tires, tires
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats