You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Volvo XC90 / XC60
Volvo XC90 vs MB M Class vs Acura MDX vs Lexus RX 350 vs BMW X5 vs Cadillac SRX

1068 messages, Last post on May 08, 2009 at 5:44 PM
You are in the Volvo XC90 / XC60 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
I just got the MDX after comparing to XC90 and RX350. The MDX is best value for the money by far, here's some pros and cons: MDX (tech/ent) Pros: 1. Well integrated audio and video and navigation 2. Excellent voice recognition 3. Great handling 4. Very techy with lots of gadgets and toys 5. 3rd row 6. Lots of "small things" included like xenon lights, backup camera, bluetooth, aux input on the tech/ent package. Cons: 1. May be too techy for some folks. If you think a blackberry or treo is too complicated, don't look at this car. Must read manual to maximize all the tools. 2. 3rd row is smaller than Volvo. 3. Roof rack, trailer hitch, and side boards are all optional (if you care for them) 4. Ugly grille. Volvo XC90 Pros: 1. Safe, high crash ratings. 2. Large roomy 3rd row 3. Nice factory headrest DVD setup 4. Nice conservative appearance (my wife likes it) Cons: 1. The 6cyl is very weak. 2. Poor reliability history ( and thus higher maintenance) 3. Navigation is really really bad and not worth its weight in paper. 4. No backup camera, just an optional radar buzzing thing. 5. Ends up 4-5k more than MDX comparably equipped. Lexus RX350 Pros: 1. Nice finish 2. Smooth drive 3. Nav is pretty good and easy to use. 4. Lexus customer service Cons: 1. No 3rd row if you need it. 2. Very boat like to drive. Handling worse than Acura of Volvo. Could be a good thing if you like driving a boat, though. 3. Its really a glorified highlander. All the interior setup is identical, shift gear box and all. 4. Hard to find the factory DVD and aftermarket doesn't look so hot. 5. Costs a little more than MDX even without the DVD. Hope that helps someone.
|
|
|
Replying to: suvhunt (May 29, 2007 6:08 am) Benz ML 350 vs Acura MDX Technology 1. Benz drives with a more solid & safe feel 2. Benz has a much better exterior front nose. 3. Surprisingly Benz holds better resale value when I checked from year to year going back to 2000. Plus I bought my premium 2007 Benz for much less than the MDX Technology 4. Better voice activated Navigation & traffic report in MDX 5. Much better looking gauges in MDX. 6. Bigger & roomier interior in MDX
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kaistring (Jul 13, 2007 10:01 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: nursebabygirl (Oct 25, 2007 6:54 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: JBaumgart (Oct 25, 2007 1:33 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: nursebabygirl (Oct 26, 2007 5:53 am) By the way, the BMW and the Lexus are not alike and appeal to different target audiences. You need to figure out which one you fall into. |
|
|
Hi everyone: Has anyone shopped the MB M-Class in relation to the MDX? What did you find notably different between the two? In your opinion, which would you prefer? I am looking at both vehicles right now, and wanted to see if other shoppers/buyers compared these two vehicles in their research. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Hi. I am trying to make a final decision and having a hard time. I have two kids so interior room is HUGE factor to me so the Lexus appears too small, is that what the rest of you think? I love the ride and feel and gadgets on the MDX, but I think the BMW looks better outside. The Mercedes is actually the LEAST expensive of them all I have found, can you believe it. I will be LEASING and they are running a Lease special for $525 a month so it's $125 less a month than the MDX so it's hard to decide. Help please!
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Volvo XC90 / XC60
Volvo XC90 vs MB M Class vs Acura MDX vs Lexus RX 350 vs BMW X5 vs Cadillac SRX
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mercedes-Benz M-Class
2009 Acura MDX
2006 Lexus RX 330
2010 BMW X5
2010 Cadillac SRX
2010 Toyota Highlander
2010 Volvo XC90



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats