You are here: Forums SUVs Volvo XC90 / XC60 Volvo XC90 vs MB M Class vs Acura MDX vs Lexus RX 350 vs BMW X5 vs Cadillac SRX

Volvo XC90 vs MB M Class vs Acura MDX vs Lexus RX 350 vs BMW X5 vs Cadillac SRX

1068 messages,  Last post on May 08, 2009 at 5:44 PM

You are in the Volvo XC90 / XC60 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mercedes-Benz M-Class, Acura MDX, Lexus RX 330, BMW X5, Cadillac SRX, Toyota Highlander, Volvo XC90, SUV

#1050 of 1068 Re: SRX vs XC90 [readerreader] by adamt12 Feb 17, 2007 (9:15 am)
Replying to: readerreader (Feb 10, 2007 1:11 am) hi, new to these forums, does anyone actually have the srx with the 3rd row, i feel it wont fit 2 adults but how about 2 pre-teen kids. Replies to this message: minime5 (Mar 01, 2007 8:43 pm)
#1051 of 1068 Re: SRX vs XC90 [adamt12] by minime5 Mar 01, 2007 (8:43 pm)
Replying to: adamt12 (Feb 17, 2007 9:15 am) Adam, I have been an owner of a SRX for three years now, and have had many pre-teen kids in the 3rd row. No problem there...I've also put two adults ( 5'5" & 5'7") back there on a one hour drive. They didn't mind at all.
#1052 of 1068 Need my 1st car..... by mattcannavo May 25, 2007 (7:53 pm)
I'm a sophomore, and am trying to decide between the Mercedes ML320 or the Acura MDX for my first car(Years 2001-2004). I prefer the Mercedes, just for the name, but the Acura is good too. They both seem pretty reliable but what do I know. Thank You. Replies to this message: wmquan (May 26, 2007 4:43 pm)
#1053 of 1068 Re: Need my 1st car..... [mattcannavo] by wmquan May 26, 2007 (4:43 pm)
Replying to: mattcannavo (May 25, 2007 7:53 pm) Of those vehicles and model years, your best bet for reliability would be a 2003-2004 MDX. 2001-2002 MDX's have a transmission design that has been problematic. ML320's don't have a good reliability record by most accounts.
#1054 of 1068 MDX vs. Volvo and Lexus by suvhunt May 29, 2007 (6:08 am)
I just got the MDX after comparing to XC90 and RX350. The MDX is best value for the money by far, here's some pros and cons:   MDX (tech/ent) Pros: 1. Well integrated audio and video and navigation 2. Excellent voice recognition 3. Great handling 4. Very techy with lots of gadgets and toys 5. 3rd row 6. Lots of "small things" included like xenon lights, backup camera, bluetooth, aux input on the tech/ent package. Cons: 1. May be too techy for some folks. If you think a blackberry or treo is too complicated, don't look at this car. Must read manual to maximize all the tools. 2. 3rd row is smaller than Volvo. 3. Roof rack, trailer hitch, and side boards are all optional (if you care for them) 4. Ugly grille.   Volvo XC90 Pros: 1. Safe, high crash ratings. 2. Large roomy 3rd row 3. Nice factory headrest DVD setup 4. Nice conservative appearance (my wife likes it) Cons: 1. The 6cyl is very weak. 2. Poor reliability history ( and thus higher maintenance) 3. Navigation is really really bad and not worth its weight in paper. 4. No backup camera, just an optional radar buzzing thing. 5. Ends up 4-5k more than MDX comparably equipped.   Lexus RX350 Pros: 1. Nice finish 2. Smooth drive 3. Nav is pretty good and easy to use. 4. Lexus customer service Cons: 1. No 3rd row if you need it. 2. Very boat like to drive. Handling worse than Acura of Volvo. Could be a good thing if you like driving a boat, though. 3. Its really a glorified highlander. All the interior setup is identical, shift gear box and all. 4. Hard to find the factory DVD and aftermarket doesn't look so hot. 5. Costs a little more than MDX even without the DVD.   Hope that helps someone. Replies to this message: kaistring (Jul 13, 2007 10:01 am) nursebabygirl (Oct 25, 2007 6:54 am) JBaumgart (Oct 25, 2007 1:33 pm) and 2 more...
#1055 of 1068 Re: MDX vs. Benz ML 350 vs Porsche vs BMW X5 by kaistring Jul 13, 2007 (10:01 am)
Replying to: suvhunt (May 29, 2007 6:08 am) From my SUV hunt, I eliminated BMW X5 (too many friends got lemons or service problems)& Porsche (best looking but poor dealer attitude with too limited warranty for a fuzzy car):   Benz ML 350 vs Acura MDX Technology                              1. Benz drives with a more solid & safe feel 2. Benz has a much better exterior front nose. 3. Surprisingly Benz holds better resale value when I checked from year to year going back to 2000. Plus I bought my premium 2007 Benz for much less than the MDX Technology 4. Better voice activated Navigation & traffic report in MDX 5. Much better looking gauges in MDX. 6. Bigger & roomier interior in MDX     I would have bought the MDX if I could tolerate the funky looking front nose from the side and from the front. Driving the Infinity FX35 actually gave me a german car feel- much better than the MDX, but the FX appearance and blind spots are even worse than the MDX. Replies to this message: nursebabygirl (Oct 25, 2007 6:54 am) JBaumgart (Oct 25, 2007 1:33 pm) nursebabygirl (Oct 26, 2007 5:53 am) and 1 more...
#1056 of 1068 looking into buying a suv by nursebabygirl Oct 25, 2007 (6:54 am)
Replying to: kaistring (Jul 13, 2007 10:01 am) i am looking into buying an suv... i don't know whether the bmw x5 or the lexus rx350 is better. can someone please help me out as to which is the better vehicle... thanks Replies to this message: JBaumgart (Oct 25, 2007 1:33 pm) nursebabygirl (Oct 26, 2007 5:53 am) JBaumgart (Oct 28, 2007 8:25 pm)
#1058 of 1068 Re: looking into buying a suv [nursebabygirl] by JBaumgart Oct 25, 2007 (1:33 pm)
Replying to: nursebabygirl (Oct 25, 2007 6:54 am) It all depends on how you define "better" - what are your most important criteria? Replies to this message: nursebabygirl (Oct 26, 2007 5:53 am) JBaumgart (Oct 28, 2007 8:25 pm)
#1059 of 1068 Re: looking into buying a suv [JBaumgart] by nursebabygirl Oct 26, 2007 (5:53 am)
Replying to: JBaumgart (Oct 25, 2007 1:33 pm) i basically want to know the ups and downs of each... i like the bmw, but i also like the lexus Replies to this message: JBaumgart (Oct 28, 2007 8:25 pm)

You are here: Forums SUVs Volvo XC90 / XC60 Volvo XC90 vs MB M Class vs Acura MDX vs Lexus RX 350 vs BMW X5 vs Cadillac SRX