Sign In Join 



Volvo XC90 vs MB M Class vs Acura MDX vs Lexus RX 350 vs BMW X5 vs Cadillac SRX

1068 messages,  Last post on May 08, 2009 at 5:44 PM

You are in the Volvo XC90 / XC60 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Mercedes-Benz M-Class, Acura MDX, Lexus RX 330, BMW X5, Cadillac SRX, Toyota Highlander, Volvo XC90, SUV


Messages Page 105 of 108
1
...
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1033 of 1068
2007 XC90 ? by futurevolvo
Mar 26, 2006 (6:55 pm)
Reply
I'm thinking of buying a new 2006 XC90 but am wondering if anyone knows what the changes will be for 2007. Do you think it's better to get the 2006 now or wait for the 2007?
#1034 of 1068
Re: MDX or ML320? which one to choose? [arun_misra] by arvin1
May 17, 2006 (3:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: arun_misra (Aug 06, 2001 8:51 pm)

I would go with the mercedes, but i heard it has some problems,but in 2007 bmw x5 will come with 3 rows of seats..
#1035 of 1068
Re: MDX or ML320? which one to choose? [arvin1] by magp
Jul 29, 2006 (5:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: arvin1 (May 17, 2006 3:00 pm)

My husband and I (yes, I'm a woman) are in the market for an SUV. We have 3 pre-teen (bigger than me) children and a labrador retriever. After driving a minivan for years I cannot compromise on size. My husband on the other hand wants luxury because he drives a GMC pickup all day (which is very luxurious with all the options, if you ask me). I suppose it should be the other way around.... however....We have checked out the Volvo XC90 and the Cadillac SRX. He is stuck on the SRX and I don't want either because those 2 third row seats in the back are useless unless you have infants or toddlers...even then can you imagine the struggle to get back there to buckle them up. No way am I buying either of these vehicles. Any advise on a compromise would be greatly appreciated. I bet the new 2007 BMW 3rd row will be exactly the same. BTW.....he doesn't want another "truck" such as a Yukon,Tahoe, Escalade which I would be happy with.
#1036 of 1068
Re: MDX or ML320? which one to choose? [magp] by wmquan
Jul 29, 2006 (8:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: magp (Jul 29, 2006 5:30 am)

Realistically, a minivan is going to provide sme of the best roominess than an SUV.
 
However, maybe a compromise would be an SUV with a wide second row to comfortably hold your three children, leaving the cargo area for your retriever? If you can put all three kids in the second row, do you really need a third row?
 
If that arrangement would work, most mid-sized SUV's would work unless your children can't comfortably fit into the second row. Of the vehicles in this thread, the MDX may have the widest second row (along with a very large cargo area).
#1037 of 1068
Re: MDX or ML320? which one to choose? [magp] by avery1
Jul 29, 2006 (8:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: magp (Jul 29, 2006 5:30 am)

Since you already have a GM product check out the new Buick Enclave and its other GM relations that are due out soon. They are supposed to have lots of room and use it effeciently. There is at least one discussion here at Edmunds following them. There is also the Ford Edge due out soon but I think that is going to be smaller. If you really have some money the Audi Q7 is out and it is also quite large I hear.
#1038 of 1068
Re: MDX or ML320? which one to choose? [avery1] by eclou
Jul 29, 2006 (4:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: avery1 (Jul 29, 2006 8:48 am)

If you want luxury and space, but not a strict minivan, you might consider the Mercedes R-class. Not real easy on the eyes, but the space and finish are excellent. You can also get excellent deals on them, as they are heavily discounted up to $10k.
#1039 of 1068
Which one to choose? by magp
Jul 29, 2006 (6:32 pm)
Reply
Thanks to all for your advise. I will check these ones out next week.
#1040 of 1068
RX350 vs. XC90 by 23109vc
Dec 31, 2006 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: magp (Jul 29, 2006 6:32 pm)

I've been in the market for an SUV / family vehicle.
 
I don't want a minivan... I don't need *that* much space.
 
i live in so cal..so AWD is not a necessity. I have two small kids, 1 yr and 5 yrs. so thrid row seats would come in handy with family get togethers - caravaning places..but it wouldn't be a feature we'd really need/use regularly..so it's not a priority.
 
i originally was looking at the XC90..i own two other volvos and like them. i rode in a friends RX330..and lked it..so i was looking at the new model.. the RX350...
 
the RX350 has 270 hp...weight less than an XC90...so it seems like power/weight it wouldb e on par with the Volvo V8. the Volvo 3.2 is much less powerful..220hp i think...which would make it a slug compared to the lexus.
 
power is only one small part of the equation.
 
living with the cars on a daily basis would be key. gettin into and out of them, storage capacity, etc.
 
is there any real differencein safety? i know volvo is known for being safe, but is the RX350 really any less safe than an XC??? both are raised up, heavy..etc...
 
for any of you who cross shopped the XC90 (either the 3.2 or V8) and the Lexus RX line...let me know what it was that swayed you one way or the other.
 
i'm looking to lease. volvo usually does 2 year leases..sweet spot for them. Lexus it is better to do 3 yrs.
 
i could probaby get a nicely equipped 3.2 Volvo for about the same as an RX350...the volvo might be a tad cheaper...if i want a V8 volvo that will cost me a bit more than the RX350... the RX is sort of in the middle price wise... a bit more than the 3.2 but a bit less than the V8.
 
if i got the volvo..i'd want the V8...but i don't need AWD...
 
my big question is aside from specs...what are the ups/downs to each of these vehicles...
any of you
#1041 of 1068
xc90 , rollover stability control by elias
Jan 10, 2007 (2:52 am)
Reply
as far as i know, the volvo is the only SUV on the list which has rollover-stability-control. this might be a factor
in some buying decisions.
for me, that was a huge safety difference. volvo let me try to roll over one of their xc90s during driver training. i tried it, up to about 50 mph & couldn't come close to inducing rollover - the vehicle is idiot-proof in that regard.
#1042 of 1068
SUV contest by susanw6
Jan 11, 2007 (5:23 pm)
Reply
I have checked out almost all the mid size luxury SUVs with 3rd row recently. My hubby is very tall and finds most cars with consoles to be uncomfortable so we had to do a lot of looking for one with more leg room. Here's my 2 cents worth on the best contenders...
 
I love the Volvo-size, looks, inside, etc. The gas pedal is strangely over to the right side and your leg practically rests up against the console. No good.
 
We checked out the Audi Q7 - Too big, can't see over the 3rd row headrests (and they don't adjust down), and not enough leg room for the hubby.
 
We both like the Acura MDX and Cadillac SRX, but I'm leaning more toward the Cadillac. I wish the Cadillac came standard with blue tooth like the MDX, but the automatic liftgate the SRX has is a big plus. Also, the real wood and luxury interior beat out the faux stuff in the MDX. The Cadillac also has adjustable foot pedals, which the MDX does not. For similarly priced vehicles, the Cadillac leases better - maybe $100/month less!
 
Check it out. Its really nice!

Messages Page 105 of 108
1
...
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement