Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Volvo XC90 / XC60 Volvo XC90 vs MB M Class vs Acura MDX vs Lexus RX 350 vs BMW X5 vs Cadillac SRX
1068 messages, Last post on May 08, 2009 at 5:44 PM
You are in the Volvo XC90 / XC60 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: music287 (Mar 24, 2006 7:59 am) |
|
|
|
| I'm thinking of buying a new 2006 XC90 but am wondering if anyone knows what the changes will be for 2007. Do you think it's better to get the 2006 now or wait for the 2007? | |
|
Replying to: arun_misra (Aug 06, 2001 8:51 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: arvin1 (May 17, 2006 3:00 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: magp (Jul 29, 2006 5:30 am) However, maybe a compromise would be an SUV with a wide second row to comfortably hold your three children, leaving the cargo area for your retriever? If you can put all three kids in the second row, do you really need a third row? If that arrangement would work, most mid-sized SUV's would work unless your children can't comfortably fit into the second row. Of the vehicles in this thread, the MDX may have the widest second row (along with a very large cargo area). |
|
|
Replying to: magp (Jul 29, 2006 5:30 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: avery1 (Jul 29, 2006 8:48 am) |
|
| Thanks to all for your advise. I will check these ones out next week. | |
|
Replying to: magp (Jul 29, 2006 6:32 pm) I don't want a minivan... I don't need *that* much space. i live in so cal..so AWD is not a necessity. I have two small kids, 1 yr and 5 yrs. so thrid row seats would come in handy with family get togethers - caravaning places..but it wouldn't be a feature we'd really need/use regularly..so it's not a priority. i originally was looking at the XC90..i own two other volvos and like them. i rode in a friends RX330..and lked it..so i was looking at the new model.. the RX350... the RX350 has 270 hp...weight less than an XC90...so it seems like power/weight it wouldb e on par with the Volvo V8. the Volvo 3.2 is much less powerful..220hp i think...which would make it a slug compared to the lexus. power is only one small part of the equation. living with the cars on a daily basis would be key. gettin into and out of them, storage capacity, etc. is there any real differencein safety? i know volvo is known for being safe, but is the RX350 really any less safe than an XC??? both are raised up, heavy..etc... for any of you who cross shopped the XC90 (either the 3.2 or V8) and the Lexus RX line...let me know what it was that swayed you one way or the other. i'm looking to lease. volvo usually does 2 year leases..sweet spot for them. Lexus it is better to do 3 yrs. i could probaby get a nicely equipped 3.2 Volvo for about the same as an RX350...the volvo might be a tad cheaper...if i want a V8 volvo that will cost me a bit more than the RX350... the RX is sort of in the middle price wise... a bit more than the 3.2 but a bit less than the V8. if i got the volvo..i'd want the V8...but i don't need AWD... my big question is aside from specs...what are the ups/downs to each of these vehicles... any of you
|
|
|
as far as i know, the volvo is the only SUV on the list which has rollover-stability-control. this might be a factor in some buying decisions. for me, that was a huge safety difference. volvo let me try to roll over one of their xc90s during driver training. i tried it, up to about 50 mph & couldn't come close to inducing rollover - the vehicle is idiot-proof in that regard. |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Volvo XC90 / XC60 Volvo XC90 vs MB M Class vs Acura MDX vs Lexus RX 350 vs BMW X5 vs Cadillac SRX
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mercedes-Benz M-Class
2009 Acura MDX
2006 Lexus RX 330
2010 BMW X5
2010 Cadillac SRX
2010 Toyota Highlander
2010 Volvo XC90
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
