Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Jeep Wrangler Jeep Wrangler
23219 messages, Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 2:45 PM
You are in the Jeep Wrangler Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: unlimitj (Jan 17, 2009 8:32 pm) If your Jeep is an automatic, you might try applying a little brake while giving it some gas in those situations when you need to make that front differential lock up. You might decide you could live with that limited slip if that trick works for you. Tom Have you hugged your Jeep today? |
|
|
Replying to: unlimitj (Jan 17, 2009 8:32 pm) IMO, the only other choice would be a selectable locker like an ARB or ECTED. Lightly braking as it starts to slip is the way to go. Don't hit the brakes if a wheel is spinning wildly though, or you'll break a halfshaft or 'u' joint. Just back off and let it slow down, then give it some brake. |
|
|
|
|
Hey folks! I am considering selling my 03 Sahara auto Wrangler and either purchasing an 06 Rubicon or maybe an 07 or newer Wrangler. I am no fan of the 4 dr model and am also somewhat concerned about moving away from the 4.0 liter, long history, and quite dependable, straight six vs. the new V6 offered in the newer models. As such, I would welcome any thoughts from those that have some experience with the new Wrangler. Mac or Tom, any thoughts?? Thanks - Chuck
|
|
|
Replying to: ocean_shipper (Jan 18, 2009 2:39 pm) The folks I know who have the newer Wranglers seem to be pretty happy with that V6. If you are going to be mainly on the pavement, it shouldn't really matter and may even be a better engine for street use than was the good old 4.0L. The concern with the V6 is low end torque, which is something the 4.0L was famous for. That really comes into play mainly when you are crawling out on the trails, so if you are not going to be "wheelin' " very much, the V6 should be fine. Apparently, the V6 doesn't do too bad in the low end torque department, because people I have wheeled with seem to be OK with it. I think I would want the Rubicon model, if I were going to get a newer Jeep with the V6 engine, because the Rubicon transfer case gives you a 4:1 gear ratio, if I remember correctly, and the other models have a 2.72:1 ratio. The lower gearing would help compensate for the lower torque of the V6 at extremely low RPM. Tom |
|
|
Replying to: ocean_shipper (Jan 18, 2009 2:39 pm)  Additionally, if you get a late model Wrangler, make sure it's a soft top unless you want to take a chance on seeing water cascading over the dash in the rain. It's an issue that still hasn't found a solution. While I could easily afford to replace my '99 if I wanted, I haven't yet seen anything Wrangler that would be a significant increase in performance or value. However, if I had to, then a two door Rubicon would probably be my choice.
|
|
|
Replying to: embeeduece (Jan 17, 2009 2:30 pm) I'm still loving my Jeep, but I haven't done much with it the last month or two.  Best of luck with your Audi (would love to see what kind ya got - I DO love the A5) and hope to see you back in a fun toy Jeep soon! -Paul |
|
|
Replying to: mac24 (Jan 19, 2009 7:25 am) 1. 4.0 engine is darn near bulletproof and a proven engine. The V6 is okay, and you can probably do things to it to make it more of a performer, but I'm not into those kinds of engine mods. 2. TJ's have a HUGE aftermarket base at THIS time and those parts are a LOT cheaper than comparable JK parts at THIS TIME. That may change as the JK is out longer, but for now, the TJ is still a LOT cheaper to mod/upgrade. 3. JK's (08+) have a tire pressure system that will drive you nuts if you airdown offroad. 07's don't have it or it works differently. IMO, if you're going to wheel it, a TJ will be easier/cheaper to fix/maintain than a new JK. I sure wouldn't wanna flop a new JK (I have flopped a TJ). Now depending on your usage, that could be different. The JK axles are generally stronger than the TJ's D44's. The JK is more streetable than the TJ (more comfortable). But if you're going to wheel it, a TJ is a better way to go (and easier to fix). Just go with the soft top only. The freedom top is a pain from what I've read about it. In making your decision, you can't go wrong with either, but each has their strengths, depending on what YOU want. -Paul |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tsjay (Jan 17, 2009 2:35 pm) Thanks, Paul, as well. I know Audi's maint can be crazy, so yeah, I had her checked thoroughly and folded a warranty into the loan. She's an '05 A4 Quattro w/ 6spd manual. Never posted a pic of the Jeep before; trying now. If successful, it's her in Joshua Tree National Park. 
|
|
|
Recently i've been having problems getting my soft top on and off. I believe the bars are bent to the point where it is ripping my top. Does anyone know a way to fix the bars so they no longer put so much pressure on the top? Also if that can't be fixed, can you just buy the hardware for the soft top, and where is a good place to do so? Thank you
|
|
|
Replying to: Jeep0523 (Jan 21, 2009 10:57 am) It is ALMOST a fine art to getting the TJ top up and down smoothly. I don't mess with it but twice a year - once in the spring to take the top off and run the safari, and once in the fall to put the soft top back on. During that time, the soft top is totally off - hardware and all. But there is a process that I find works. But I would like to know if you have done anything to the soft top hardware (bows/frame) that would put any kind of stress on the top. Properly fit, it IS tight, but the cold does NOT help at all. -Paul
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Jeep Wrangler Jeep Wrangler
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Jeep Wrangler
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
