Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Toyota 4Runner Toyota 4Runner
11422 messages, Last post on Nov 19, 2009 at 5:00 PM
You are in the Toyota 4Runner Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: ghosh (Jun 14, 2006 9:20 am) It's easy to forget: ghosh, "Toyota 4Runner" #10370, 24 Dec 2004 7:13 am!keywords= I don't think Chuck was calling anyone a liar but he was expressing skepticism. And we can't be all that certain that bt won't/hasn't returned.  tidester, host |
|
|
Replying to: ghosh (Jun 14, 2006 9:20 am) Can you get a "good fluke" tank? Yes, if someone tells me that got 25mpg in a V8 4Runner while on the open road,not running the air conditioner, with over-inflated tires, going down hill, with a tail wind that is a different story.
|
|
|
Replying to: nedzel (Jun 14, 2006 7:40 am) And in this day and age with global warming, green-house gases, wars and being beholding to foreign countries for our very livelyhood, and prices of gas in general, if you could squeeze a few more mpg's from an engine it seems it would be worth it. The Camry engine (in the Camry) is rated at 22/31 mpg's which I'm sure would reduce somewhat. But if you could put that engine or a similar one in the 4R and get even 19/25 I think that would be huge. I don't really need a mondo hauling vehicle. Just something to get me through a few feet of snow, or a little off road and carry all my camping gear, kayaks and bikes. Anyway thanks for the thoughtful replies. Jeffer3
|
|
|
Replying to: jeffer3 (Jun 14, 2006 6:27 pm) The V6 4Runner is probably close to 1000lbs heavier than the Camry, it is 4WD (I know there is a 2WD model but you talked about snow and off road), and most importantly it has the aerodynamic shape of a brick on 4 wheels  . Even if you don't tow, the 4Runner has to come with the ability to tow (5000 lbs for the V6 - 7000 lbs for the V8) because many do tow with their Runner. The rpm range where torque peaks is probably lower with the 4Runner engines (very important when under load) as opposed to the Camry's high revving engine. There are many factors that go into fuel mileage, including engine displacement. I'm sure Toyota designed the engines that go into 4Runners as the best compromise of fuel economy balanced off against the demands of a 4WD truck with great off road capability and sheer pulling power.
|
|
|
Replying to: biglatka (Jun 14, 2006 7:19 pm) "and most importantly it has the aerodynamic shape of a brick",
|
|
|
Replying to: chuck1 (Jun 14, 2006 10:38 am) |
|
|
I get 16-17mpg in easy city driving and 20-21mpg on the freeway at a steady 65-75mph. This is with full time 4WD and the V8. I have never used 87 octane, always using 89 or 93. The onboard computer is exactly 3mpg optimistic.
|
|
|
Replying to: sacstate1 (Jun 16, 2006 9:39 am) That's fantastic! Your getting 1mpg more than the EPA RATED mpg highway at 21! Even with the V8 and lugging around the extra running gear for the 4WD! Going faster than 65mph! (WOW - that TAIL WIND MUST REALLY BE BLOWING!!)
|
|
|
Replying to: jeffer3 (Jun 14, 2006 6:27 pm) Which is exactly why we may see a diesel engine -- it will get 30% greater mileage than a similar power gas engine. Btw, peak torque values are not everything. What's most important is the torque curve. I'm willing to bet that at low RPM the 4.0 V6 has more torque than the Camry motor. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: chuck1 (Jun 16, 2006 11:04 am)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Toyota 4Runner Toyota 4Runner
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Toyota 4Runner
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
