Sign In Join 



SUV gas mileage - Feel free to participate

1070 messages,  Last post on Jun 04, 2009 at 10:34 AM

You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Ford Expedition, GMC Envoy, Chevrolet Suburban, Ford Escape, Honda CR-V, Nissan Pathfinder, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV


Messages Page 5 of 107
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
107
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 1070
2000 GMC Jimmy by heng
Oct 04, 2000 (11:29 pm)
Reply
Just did a 350 mile trip this past weekend. 1st in this vehicle. Got a solid 20 mpg. Kept it mostly to 65 mph but includes a good 40 miles of crawling around town.
#42 of 1070
2001 Ford Excursion by dmez
Oct 05, 2000 (2:28 am)
Reply
I only have about 700 miles on our new truck. Drove it to upstate NY this past weekend and maintained about 15 mpg on the highway and about 11 mph around town. Trip was about 300 miles round trip. Speed was 65 mph to 70 mph.
#43 of 1070
2000 Suburban 5.3L 3.73 gear 4X2 by selman
Oct 06, 2000 (5:46 pm)
Reply
City avg. approx. 13-14. Mixed avg. 15-16, Haven't had an opportunity to check Hwy. only.
Mileage decreases about 1-1.5 MPG when pulling 1500 to 1800 lbs. (2 waverunner/gear).
#44 of 1070
2000 RX300 by itzkirb
Oct 06, 2000 (6:43 pm)
Reply
City/Highway(SF Traffic) average overall about 21mpg. only 2000 miles on the car so hopefully it will get better with time.
#45 of 1070
Disgusted 4-Runner owner by mark_aidan
Oct 17, 2000 (12:56 pm)
Reply
I purchased a 1999 Toyota 4-Runner Limited about 3 months ago and have been having a real problem with fuel consumption. The mpg was listed at 17-20 mpg highway with a tank that is to hold 18.5 gallons of fuel. Neither of these stats have held true. First, my suv will only hold 13.5 gallons and I have averaged 180 miles per tank of gas over the 3 months. Now simple math tells me I am still only getting 13.33... mpg. My questions are: 1) Have any you 4-Runner owners had these types of problems with this make/model. 2) Why will this suv only hold 13.5 gallons of fuel(this has not changed for 3 months also). And 3) Is there a recall on the 4-Runner for problems will fuel consumption, inaccurate gauges or the wrong size gas tank on the 4-Runner. The Toyota dealership says there is no problem. I fail to see it that way. I would appreciate any information that anyone could offer up to make some sense of this situation.
#46 of 1070
Jeep Grand Cherokee2000 by rinkinkin
Oct 17, 2000 (5:46 pm)
Reply
My 2000 GCL V8 with Quadra Trac :
City 13.5 to 14 imperial m/g
haven't check highway m/g yet.
#47 of 1070
fuel mileage site by bobs5
Oct 18, 2000 (12:01 pm)
Reply
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/
#48 of 1070
Nissan Pathfinder SE 2000 by razor22
Oct 20, 2000 (5:07 am)
Reply
Automatic transmission:


City average 16.8 Imp mpg
Combined average 21.01 Imp mpg
Highway average 23.23 Imp mpg (Hwy 20-22 Imp mpg with 9ft Kayak on roof rack and camping supplies piled inside)


Although fuel is sold by liters up here, I always change it to Imperial gallons.


Please remember there is a difference in Imperial gallons to US gallons.


I didn't do the math conversion from the Imperial Gallon to the US gallon or to the Metric Liters.


Approximate conversions:
4.546 L = 1 Imperial gallon
1 Imperial gallon =1.25 US gallons
1 US gallon = .75 Imperial gallons
#49 of 1070
Nissan Pathfinder SE 2000 by razor22
Oct 20, 2000 (5:11 am)
Reply
Forgot to mention, it is also 4X4.
#50 of 1070
'98 Mercury Mountaineer V8 AWD by jeffmust2
Oct 22, 2000 (9:04 pm)
Reply
With 40,000 miles, never better than 15mpg on 100% freeway and 9-11 mpg in the city. Average in mixed mode is about 12 mpg; thank god it's regular fuel!


EPA was 14/18 mpg; EPA dyno operator must have been on coffee break or asleep at the switch when they tested this puppy.


Interesting Ford Motor Co. statement in a recent article on the new Explorer/Mountaineer coming out early next year with the 4.6L V-8 instead of the 40-year-old 5.0L V8 -- here's how they plan to increase mpg by 25% in these SUVs:


1. Increase vehicle weight by 250-300 pounds (huh?)
2. Keep the same aerodynamics as before (huh?)
3. Admit that the 4.6L is not that much more fuel-efficient than the old 5.0L (OK)
4. (Drumroll - here's The Real Answer):
   a. Install 5-speed automatic instead of 4-speed
      with new model introduction
   b. Within a year after that, introduce a 6- speed automatic


In other words - gear that sucker down to where it will be doing about 1200 rpm at 70 mph, a "semi-coast" mode. Hope all you folks towing something like dropping back into 3rd or 4th gear to go up 2% grades!


Sounds like a way to fool the EPA highway mpg test - wanna bet the new numbers with the 6-speed look like "14 mpg city, 28 mpg highway"?!


JM

Messages Page 5 of 107
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
107
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement