Sign In Join 



Dodge Durango

1696 messages,  Last post on Nov 05, 2009 at 9:50 PM

You are in the Dodge Durango Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Dodge Durango, SUV


Messages Page 5 of 170
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
170
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 1696
Rebate by q8740
May 17, 2000 (2:53 am)
Reply
I would call dodge, there web site says $1000.00 on all durangos
and $500 dollars on lease's w a 5.9 motor.




I did call a local dodge dealer and the fleet mgr did not want to tell me that there is a rebate. I was inquiring on a R/T and he said there is no rebate on that vehicle fore sure.....


WRONG ......another scam
#42 of 1696
Anything on the 2001 Durango? by humpy
May 17, 2000 (2:17 pm)
Reply
Does anyone have any information on what is new for the 2001 Durango and when will it be available? I want to buy a new D but was curious about the new models.
#43 of 1696
by dwh6
May 17, 2000 (4:36 pm)
Reply
I haven't heard much, but I did hear that the model will be "refreshed" and that it will have some additional features, such as heated seats, that were not previously offered.
#44 of 1696
full time transfer case by emale
May 22, 2000 (6:44 am)
Reply
i'm helping a friend with a possible durango purchase and need some advice. i know that the 4.7l engine and new 4 speed tranny can be had with a full-time transfer case, which i believe is basically the same as the one in the jeep grand cherokee. however, there seems to be quite a few driveline problems with those similarly equipped jeeps. has anyone here had a problem with their 4.7l powertrain including the full-time transer case? thanks.
#45 of 1696
4.7l & towing by fboykin
May 24, 2000 (7:18 pm)
Reply
Anyone with experience towing a 2000 lb. boat and trailer with the standard 4.7l engine and 3.55 axle set up? I'll be towing occasionally and was looking to get the "standard" engine package for all around gas mileage plus that seems to be a common set up at the dealers around Atlanta. I know there are lots of pros & cons; I'm hoping to hear from someone who's actually towed with one. Thanks.
#46 of 1696
emale by nrd525
May 25, 2000 (10:49 am)
Reply
  The Jeep had two DIFFERENT full time 4wd setups,the QuadraTrac (the one with all the problems),and the selectrac,just a full time transfer case,no oddball differentials,and no problems associated with it.
  A Durango with the full time 4WD should be as trouble free as one with part time.I was going to buy one,but it was just a LITTLE too small.So I ended up with a full size 4Dr truck.With a bed lid,it's as useful as a Full size SUV,for thousands less!
#47 of 1696
Fboykin by nrd525
May 25, 2000 (11:00 am)
Reply
  My friend bought a Durango to tow his 18' boat,it has the 4.7 3.92(i think that's the number),full time transfer case,and 4wheel ABS.I would think twice before going with the 3.55 for towing.His is ok,not spectacular.It does tow better than his late Dakota Club Cab 4x4 5.2 3.55 that was wrecked last year.I have driven both,and ridden in another Dakota 5.9 with 3.55 gears,and it was miles ahead of the other two.I was only a test drive away from buying a 5.9 3.92,fulltime 4wd,4wheel abs.If it had just a little more comfortable seats,and a little more room in the front area,I would have gone for it,in Patriot blue!
 The milage penalty with the higher gears would only be maybe a mile per gallon,and the Durango would be peppier in all conditions.
  
#48 of 1696
by dwh6
May 25, 2000 (3:33 pm)
Reply
I agree with nrd525. (Isn't amazing how BIG Durangos look from the outside, but how COZY they are in the front passenger area?).


Fboykin: I suggest you go to the Durango Owners' Club forum (http://www.durangoclub.com/ceilidh/ceilidh.html)and ask your question. Someone there will be able to tell you specifically what your limitations are going to be.


(http://www.durangoclub.com/ceilidh/ceilidh.html)
#49 of 1696
4.7 vs the 5.9 towing by slclark3
May 25, 2000 (9:59 pm)
Reply
I too have driven both 4.7 with 3.55/3.92 and the 5.9 with 3.55/3.92 and I found the 4.7 quicker with both ratios of rearends. Both 5.9s felt strong but a little slugglish. I thought since I wasn't going to tow anything the 4.7 was best for me. With 4.7 overhead cam it turn quicker from a lower R.P.M. range. The 5.9 would work better as a tow vehicle but if you want a SUV that accelerates like sports car I would go with 4.7. It is also better on gas. I went with 4.7 with 3.92 gears.
#50 of 1696
4.7 vs 5.9 reliability by terryo2
May 26, 2000 (12:53 am)
Reply
I am looking at the Durango to tow a small to medium sized trailer. The specs indicate that either V8 should do the job with the 3.92 axle.
The 4.7 is billed as a next generation engine in the brochure. What is new about it? Is there a reliability advantage with either engine?
Thanks

Messages Page 5 of 170
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
170
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement