You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Cadillac Escalade
Cadillac Escalade

994 messages, Last post on Oct 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM
You are in the Cadillac Escalade Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: luvboxrs (Feb 20, 2006 12:19 pm) |
|
|
|
I went to buy a new Escalade ESV this past week, but was "shocked" to discover the lack of adequate head clearance. I am only 6'2", but could not get comfortable. The salesman seemed amazed, but I cannot believe others have not commented. We now drive an LX470 which has plenty of headroom. Any ideas on why the difference? Will the 07 ESV have this problem solved?
|
|
|
Gee, A posting flurry! I'm 6'2 and 240 lbs and used to massive space in a vehicle. I drive a Dodge Ram extended cab right now and it is rooooomy. I felt cramped in the LX470. I've driven the Escalade and it felt pretty roomy in comparison although not as voluminous as my Dodge. I almost bought one last year but decided to wait for the 6 speed tranny. I'm down on the looks from the pics I've seen but ultimately I don't pick a vehicle on looks. They say they have added leg room. Perhaps the seat goes down further as it goes back. Really the only contender I see on the landscape is the LX but it's ten grand more than the caddy and it's tight inside. May let the wife get that one. I want an EXT. This may be the last year for such a vehicle as the oil situation is only going to get worse as it looks now. I just received my Escalade brochure in the mail and I'm fairly impressed. Still want to hear from Edmond's however. Get off your butts guys! One thing I am still questioning is the engine. I thought this new aluminum motor was sposed to have that feature of dropping to 6 or 4 cylinders at highway speed? Don't see any mention of it in the brochure. Anybody know anything.
|
|
|
Replying to: sfleming (Feb 20, 2006 6:58 pm) Also interesting that the final drive ratio offered on the '07 Esky is 3.42; guess GM felt that the increased power in the new engine would partially offset any low-end off-the-line grunt due to dropping from a 3.73 to a 3.42 rear end...that and the fact that a taller (or is it shorter--I always get the two mixed up) final drive offers relatively better fuel economy than a shorter (taller?) and a higher top end--at least theoretically. |
|
|
Replying to: rcf8000 (Feb 16, 2006 7:22 am) I don't know what editorial has scheduled for testing, but let them know what you'd like to see written up: Contact us or just email using editor Here's a First Look and some spy shots to tide you over. Steve, Host |
|
|
A major national newspaper would like to interview those who bought a 2007 Lincoln Navigator or a Cadillac Escalade and got a sizable discount off the sticker price. Please respond to jfallon |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: doubleagle (Feb 20, 2006 5:52 pm) |
|
|
Does anyone know when the 2007 EXT will be available? Also, any chance that the rear window in the 2007 EXT will be power activated? |
|
According to Edmunds, the 2006 EXT is supposed to have a "movable load floor." Has anyone seen this? When I went to the dealer, the salesman didn't know what I was talking about (shock) and I sure couldn't see anything in the bed that looked like it moved. Does this only come as part of the power tonneau cover (which the '06s I looked at didn't have), or is Edmunds (say it ain't so) wrong?
|
|
|
Replying to: jimvee (Mar 14, 2006 12:57 pm) Steve, Host |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Cadillac Escalade
Cadillac Escalade
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Cadillac Escalade
2010 Cadillac Escalade EXT
2010 Cadillac Escalade ESV



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats