Sign In Join 



Consumer Reports praises Toyota Tundra - READ ONLY

134 messages,  Last post on Apr 15, 2000 at 2:00 PM

You are in the Pickups - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is kcram

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Pickups Host for directions! discussion.


Messages Page 8 of 14
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#68 of 134
pcheng.... by trucksrme
Apr 03, 2000 (2:06 pm)
Read the bio, anit too hard to figure this one out now. Me and Franklin be cousins, never said 1st cousins now. Got to admit we did have too 3rd cousins get hitched, but they aint had no youngins as of yet.
#69 of 134
Dueling Banjos..... by tundrasaursrex
Apr 03, 2000 (11:07 pm)
TRUCKSRME.....any chance it was you playing the banjo in Deliverence? And does your family tree have any branches in it?????


kind of makes you go hmmmmmmm...yuck!


What kind of haul in the phrase "squeal like a pig"
#70 of 134
RE: trucksrme by pcheng
Apr 04, 2000 (2:02 am)
See, I knew you had a sense of humor
#71 of 134
re: #89 arkie6 by werking
Apr 04, 2000 (1:58 pm)
arkie6:
     quite frankly, my motives are simple. to use you folks as a source of entertainment and comic relief. i love sitting at my desk each day imagining you with your eyes closed, hands clasped together saying, "i wish i had a full-size truck. i wish i had a full-size truck. i wish i had a full-size truck..."


rooster:
     you talked about some things that i think many people consider when buying a four-wheel drive/work truck. step-in height, acceleration, ride quality "that [you] would consider to challenge a Cadillac", easier to park, tightest turning radius, less sheetmetal to clean, and cooler colors. ask anyone on here and i think you'll find these items top their list of discriminating factors as well - NOT.
     how can you say that dakota should be classed with the s-10 and ranger? the only spec that tundra wins when compared to dakota is hauling capacity (by 900 lbs) and the dakota is sporting a v6, while the tundra has the v8. dakota is physically bigger than tundra. so, no, i wouldn't consider putting dakota back with s-10 and ranger, i would pit tundra vs. dakota as the only two currently in the mid-sized class.
     as for the tundra 4.7L V8 hanging with the chevy 5.3L V8, i don't think so. the chevy's specs for hauling/payloading/towing all outperform the tundra. if you're talking racing, you're getting the wrong kind of vehicle. also, you mentioned "doesn't take up half the road and then some, will have more clearance in parking garages". the toy is actually a little wider and taller than the silverado, oh by the way. the turning radius is only 3 feet better than the 'rado, which can be attributed to the 15" longer wheelbase, and 10" overall length increase on the 'rado. if you're going to comment on these vehicles, at least do it honestly. for your info: my basis for the comparison today were the tundra access cab 4wd limited and the silverado 1500 ext cab 4wd. all my info is from edmunds.


tundra can join dodge as a proud member of "the middle two." how's that?


by the way, you say you haven't bought a truck yet. go with the silverado. the discriminating factors you cited will not disappoint you with the silverado. but the first time you sit at a stop light in your new tundra, and a silverado pulls up next to you, you're going to do your best to dust him off the line. you know why? because you'll FEEL inferior. and he'll prob'ly just cruise off the line without ever having noticed you. because he'll know he's driving the best full-size truck (out of three available) on the road today. and he won't even notice you're there.


kyle
#72 of 134
Consumer Reports quiz by markbuck
Apr 04, 2000 (5:19 pm)
What american beer did they pick as best a couple of years ago?








I rest my case.....
#73 of 134
by smcpherr
Apr 04, 2000 (6:22 pm)
Markbuck-
  Is the answer you are looking for "who cares?"
#74 of 134
To werking by Daggett
Apr 04, 2000 (6:33 pm)
So you really think that Tundra owners are wishing they had a full-size truck and feel inferior to Chevy owners? I'll bet whatever amount of $ you want to bet that there is a smaller percentage of tunda owners who regret their purchase than Chevy owners (of the same time frame tundra has been on the market) who regret their purchase. What do you care to wager?


Now this will be entertainment and comic relief.




Regarding your quote that the "dakota is physically bigger than tundra". Comparing 4x4 extended cabs, the dak is smaller in length, width, height, weight, clearance, front headroom, front shoulder space, and front hip room.


Trucks are falling into categories such as "full size", "mid-size", or "compact" with decreasing frequency. If you take exception to Toyota calling their truck full size, then compare it to the Dakota.
#75 of 134
reply to #96 (werking) by arkie6
Apr 04, 2000 (6:40 pm)
Kyle, your living in a fantasy world if you think that I am regretting not getting a Silverado. My previous truck was a Chevy and after all of the problems that I had with it I vowed that GM would not get any more of my hard earned dollars.


I am completely satisfied with my Tundra, actually could not be happier. I have not had the first problem with it and it fits my needs perfectly. If I had a need to tow loads in excess of 6000+ pounds on a regular basis, I would have went with a Ford F250, not a Silverado. But with the 3/4 ton, I would have sacrificed the smooth, quite, and sporty ride of the Tundra.


Alan
#76 of 134
hehehe by werking
Apr 04, 2000 (10:00 pm)
god i love this...
#77 of 134
dagget... by anonymous
Apr 04, 2000 (10:12 pm)
     not gonna speak for anyone else. my silverado has been positively flawless. i expected something...some small problem. NADA. it's great. i've been reading here for a bit, and i haven't heard too many folks complaining about their 2000 silverados. i think 99 was a rough "new model" year and 2000 is working much better.
     frankly, i'd be embarrassed to be seen in a tundra. the reason you feel inferior is the same reason you folks come in here bragging about consumer reports "we like trucks the more they're like our cars" rating the tundra so high on reliability when there's no way to accurately gauge that. now you want to hedge by saying,


"Trucks are falling into categories such as "full size", "mid-size", or "compact" with decreasing frequency."


that's you "i really wish i had a big truck" tundra folks who want to say that. i will compare the tundra to the dakota, it's the only similar truck out there.....


kyle

Messages Page 8 of 14
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement