Sign In Join 



Consumer Reports praises Toyota Tundra - READ ONLY

134 messages,  Last post on Apr 15, 2000 at 2:00 PM

You are in the Pickups - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is kcram

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Pickups Host for directions! discussion.


Messages Page 2 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5 of 134
Oh........Goooood Grieeeef.... by bud_light_dude
Mar 06, 2000 (5:56 am)
Another literal Consumer Report believer!


Guess we all have to have a good laugh now and then. I don't believe anything those magazine reports state. Motor Trend gave the Silverado Truck of the Year in 99. Now Consumer Reports rates it "below average" in 00. I don't think so. Everyone knows that the newest models and designs are always pushed and advertized as the best and all the others get terrible ratings.


But, there are people all over the world that will believe it as gospel. What Chuckleheads.
#6 of 134
Devil 1 by ferris47
Mar 06, 2000 (2:18 pm)
I love my Tundra, and have had no problems whatsoever but the fact remains that it is a brand new truck. I would be willing to bet that initial quality is better and I would surmise a guess that overall quality will be better but there is really no way of knowing that until at least a couple of years.


Does CR make a statment like they are talking about inital quality? Just curious. They would have to be making the same educated guess that I made when I bought the truck. I did read an article, though, where Ivan Stuart was given a pre-production Tundra and told to "Go break it" and all he could do was screw up one of the access doors and get it really really dirty. That was selling point to me.


If you go with the Tundra I think you will be happy, but take the CR article with a grain of salt on long term reliability. It still remains to be seen, although I truely believe it will last longer and better then the others.
#7 of 134
Oil Change by jaijay
Mar 06, 2000 (4:11 pm)
I guess Ivan Stewart or Consumer Reports have ever changed the oil in one of those Tundras.
#8 of 134
by Rocles
Mar 07, 2000 (5:55 am)
I'll stick with Fords. They seem to get the least press crap--pro and con---must be those ugly front ends, eh?


  In all seriousness, don't ever buy what a moto-journalist spews from their pseudo-intelligence in the subject. Most of these guys are rejects from good magazines and either settled for the paycheck or came into the buisness with some form of bias for a manufactuer in one way or another.
  I take motorcycle mags as a comparison. Most of these clowns either dream of yesterday Brit icons (BSA, Enfield or Norton) or rave about a rare and expensive bike like Aprilia. They mutter about the big four from Japan and always dismiss HD and gloss over BMWs. Why? Because they aren't "exotic" to talk about. Why don't they bring up the old Triumphs? Too common--everyone had one. HD? Too much image--good and bad.
 Truck and car mags are no different. They always rave about teh new and throw out the common or older models despite the stats.
#9 of 134
devil1 by jcmdie
Mar 07, 2000 (4:41 pm)
What percentage of Tundra trucks do think are purchased as work trucks as opposed to domestic trucks? I have not seen or heard of any fleet users that have bought the Tundra. There may be a few independant workers with them but I think that you will find that almost all of the Tundras bought are family cars. That is thier market. Nothing wrong with that but it is not fair to compare a truck used to go to Home Depot once a month with trucks that are used for hauling and towing daily.


In addition to that, realize that there hasn't been a Honda or Toyota that Consumer Reports didn't like. You would have to look real hard to find any Dodge or Chevy that they do like. There is good information in that magazine but only if taken with a grain of salt.
#10 of 134
jcmdie by devil1
Mar 07, 2000 (7:09 pm)
You make an intelligent case (unlike some other people). That would work in the equation, but not to the extent to change the whole outcome (Maybe Ford, they have a big market of Fleet trucks and such). Dodge and Chevy don't nearly have as much share though.


In reference to your second question, I used to own a Tacoma and they ripped it to shreds in Consumer Reports. I was very disappointed after reading it. Although in reliability it did fine, but they hated the truck. I, on the other hand, loved my Taco.


Again, I am debating between the F-150 and Tundra. Chevy and Dodge are not in my consideration due mainly to looks and info I find.


I right now own a 97 Eclipse that consumer reports ripped to pieces on reliability, and it HAS been very unreliable. Nothing too major but it has been in shop probably 6 or 7 times in 3 years. (Not too good)
#11 of 134
by Rocles
Mar 08, 2000 (5:12 am)
ouch! I felt that one from here!
#12 of 134
jcmdie by tundradude
Mar 09, 2000 (11:50 pm)
What percentage of Tundra trucks do think are
purchased as work trucks as opposed to domestic
trucks?


You would be surprised! My county bought 18 of them.
#13 of 134
tundradude by barlitz
Mar 10, 2000 (2:01 am)
I am mortified, stupified and horrified to read that my tax dollars are being spent on foreign trucks.
#14 of 134
barlitz by tundradude
Mar 10, 2000 (4:10 am)
Actually that was my tax dollars in this case.

Messages Page 2 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement