Last post on Nov 07, 2013 at 3:04 PM
You are in the Chrysler Town & Country/Dodge Grand Caravan
What is this discussion about?
Chrysler Town and Country, Dodge Caravan, Plymouth Voyager, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Transmission, Van
Go to NHTSA to file a safety complaint.
Or call Monday-Friday (8 am to 8 pm ET) (888) 327-4236 TTY: (800)424-9153
#466 of 2083 Re: 1998 Dodge Grand Caravan -- Should I buy it? [loahei #460]
Apr 23, 2004 (5:32 am)
We just traded in our 1998 Dodge Caravan Sport with 77,000 miles. Last year at 66,000 we had to replace the head gaskets for 850.00. If you go on edmunds and look at the consumer reviews for that specific model year you'll see that that the transmissions go and the A/C compressor. I would NOT buy it. We got rid of ours now because we didn't want to pay for a new transmission or compressor down the rode when trade-in was only $3500 for it now. We just bought a new 2004 Caravan SXT yesterday and I love it but after 7 years we will get rid of it. Like the Caravans but don't believe they are 10 plus year cars. ALso, another reader said his 2004 SXT's tranmission needs to be replaced at only 5900 miles and they was to put a refurbished one in not a brand-new one. So sometimes you have to be lucky. But we got our van for 20,500 out the door with the popular equipment pkg, quad seats, cd player. There are great deals to be had maybe a Dodge brand is not something to buy used. Look at new ones, they have 4500 manufacturer to dealer incentives for marketing that our dealer gave to us just to decrease his inventory.
#467 of 2083 Re: 1998 Dodge Grand Caravan -- Should I buy it? [loahei #460]
Apr 23, 2004 (6:35 am)
THanks everyone! I'm starting my homework now!
#468 of 2083 Misc thoughts
Apr 24, 2004 (1:05 pm)
I've been tracking the DC mini-van transmission issues (the Dextron fiasco and otherwise) for a number of years now, and one thing I've noticed is that, unless I'm missing something, the problems seem to be more concentrated with the mini-vans equipped with the smaller engines. To the best of my knowledge, I only remember one or maybe two reports of 3.8 liter vans having a problem.
With that in mind, and after a combined seven years and 100,000 miles on our two 3.8 vans (our 1998 has 82K and our 2003 has 20K), and having driven a number of rental DC vans with lesser motors, a couple of possible explanations have occurred to me.
1) Could it be that the transmission has a problem with frequent excursions into the higher RPM range? I ask this because whenever I drive/ride in a van with the 3.3 or the 3.0, I am always surprised at how hard the engines have to be pushed to achieve decent acceleration compared to the 3.8.
2) Could it be that the transmissions mated to the 3.8 mill are in some way beefier than those in the other vans?
3) Could it be a combination of the two?
Do any of you have any in site that might either validate or invalidate one or both of my suppositions?
An interesting side note; in our current neighborhood, there are three Odyssey vans and our two Grand Caravans. Within that population of five vans there have been two transmission failures, none of them ours. I guess any manufacturer can have a problem with their automatic gearboxes. Even still, it seem that the Oddy owners look sort of askance at our "unreliable" Dodges, even though the only unscheduled failure for said Dodges was a battery on our 1998 after 50K miles. Go figure.
#469 of 2083 Re: transmission questions
Apr 24, 2004 (3:55 pm)
Shipo, I do believe that the automatic that Chrysler mates to the 3.8 is a different transmission. My AT knowledge is mostly associated with Chrysler RWD versions, but Chrysler uses the same basic power transmission architecture on all of its automatics. The only one that has varied significantly enough to mention is the RWD 545RFE used on Jeeps and Dodge trucks.
When it comes to mini-vans my belief is that they are used by their owners closer to or beyond the designed service limits yet maintained like cars, which translates to not enough maintenance. Dexron in Chrysler mini-vans is a far more common than most people realize. I've seen many more Chrysler FWD automatics go to 150,000 miles and more without ANY problems or failures. But the large portion of them were maintained correctly.
Change the filter and AT fluid on a scheduled basis and I think you'll find that the failure rate (ie: rebuild rate) will be less that on a Toyota or Honda.
#470 of 2083 transmission fails to shift
Apr 25, 2004 (1:32 pm)
I too have a Town and Country that fails to shift. My problem is temperature related. If I start the van in cold weather it stays in first gear. But if I drive a short distance, then turn the engine off and on again, it is fine. Until the van is cold again and it fails to shift again. It sounds like a computer reset problem to me, but I am trying to find someone who may know something about it. Now that the weather has warmed up, the problem is not evident. I guess it waits for cold weather. Hope that a simple repair can correct the problem.
#471 of 2083 Dustyk....
Apr 25, 2004 (4:29 pm)
Your thoughts please... I'll insert a liability disclaimer for you here (wink). What intervals would you recommend for changing the fluid and filter on my 2000 3.2/Autostick equipped Intrepid ES? As you may recall from my post--I had the fluid and filter changed at roughly 40K...I'm now at 84,000. My driving is rather bi-modal. Short trips around the area and long road trips monthly..
#472 of 2083 Jason.....................
Apr 26, 2004 (2:02 pm)
Well, the filter and fluid changes on Chrysler-built FWD cars use to be 35-70K, depending on schedule "A" or "B." If you follow the severe service schedule, 35 or 40K should be fine.
I think your 2000 was designed around ATF+3, which is still available and about $1 cheaper a quart than ATF+4. I would use the ATF+4 if it were my car.
#473 of 2083 DustyK....
Apr 27, 2004 (6:48 am)
Thanks for the info. Apparently you missed my maintenance story from a while back. All second generation Intrepids are designed around ATF+4 fluid. After reminding two service managers(Strauss Auto)and mentioning that they could get ATF+4 from the local Dodge dealer--they filled me up with ATF+3. Had I not noticed it on the service receipt when picking up my car I would have driven off with it. I got the Dodge Service Manager on the phone, told him what happened, handed the phone to the other service manager. They promptly PUSHED her back in--drained the tranny, FLUSHED the tranny, then filled it with ATF+4. Damn stuff sure is expensive!
#474 of 2083 "You think?"
Apr 27, 2004 (11:41 am)
In post #469 dustyk writes:
"Change the filter and AT fluid on a scheduled basis and I think you'll find that the failure rate (ie: rebuild rate) will be less that on a Toyota or Honda."
You really believe this dustyk?. IMO, hell would freeze over if that's the case.
#475 of 2083 Impact01
Apr 27, 2004 (12:03 pm)
Given Honda's on going problem with their transmissions, it seems that Hell hath frozen over already.
Regarding the Toyota, I'd be much more worried about engine sludge (Toyota's current bug-a-boo) than a transmission failure.