You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans
GMC Safari & Chevy Astro
GMC Safari/Chevy Astro

1889 messages, Last post on Nov 13, 2009 at 9:04 AM
You are in the GMC Safari & Chevy Astro Forum. Your Host is Karens
|
if Verizon (or whomever has the van) can provide some type of records for service, the van should be great. Highway miles are the Chev/GMCs best friend. I've had 2: one company (98) and now my own (00) and have had great luck. A friend of mine is in the same business with an AWD and while a little more front end care is needed, no major (over $200) problems. My '00 now has 90K and runs just as strong as new. I thought about doing the 0% thing but when I drove off for the test drive the only difference was the tightness in the shift lever. Yes I maintain mine to the letter, but you get back what you put in. Good Luck! |
|
| Thought I'd give my 2 cents. Both of my vans have been 2WD models and I have had great luck. I sell construction products so off road driving is no stranger to the vehicles. My company van (98) was handed down with 45K and not alot checked off in the service book. I turned it in with 130K 2 years later and one of my customers ended up buying it from our lease agency. It now has 220K and a smashed front fender. My friend does similar duty with his AWD. Granted, he doesn't have to work as hard crossing a jobsite on a rainy day but let's face it, not many people need that type of traction. I think the AWD should be looked at only if snow, off-road driving (camping) or other constant traction defficient driving condition is present. | |
|
The AWD obviously adds to the mechanical complexity of the van. I'm told the front end and transfer case of the AWD is similar to the S10 units and can be swapped if necessary. S10s are plentiful in the wrecking yards. AWD Astros are not. A custom length front drive shaft is necessary. So if you wanted the better mpg of RWD but wanted to retain some poor traction and lose some of the issues related to the AWD transfer case, consider this swap. See http://www.overlandvans.com |
|
|
|
|
2 cents are very helpful, thanks dadoftay! I have a 1992 Astro CL EXT with 88K and I have had great luck with it. SOOOO, I am now considering yet another new Astro(RWD LT 2004 perhaps?). Do you know what (if any) major changes GM has made to the Astro since 92 that might change my opinion of this being a reliable van? Have there been "better" Astro years than others? Was 1992 a "good" year??? I do agree with your comment "Yes I maintain mine to the letter, but you get back what you put in". Is it possible that this is the key in being a happy Astro owner? The mechanic the I use for both of my vehicles(we also have a 1990 Olds) has voiced a concern about the Astro ABS system. Is there a bad history in this area over the years? He REALLY does not care for the AWD idea on an Astro. Any bad history on this? I sure do appreciate all comments ! ! ! Thanks, Jock |
|
| Wasn't really responding to your question, just sorta broadcasting. | |
| Unfortunately I don't know of any "good years" for the Astro/Safaris. I do know in '03 they added a little more pep to the engine and some emission features (I'm assuming the emissions delete the power gains) but pretty much straight forward Astro. The only thing I never cared for was the dash configuration in the pre-95. Alot of reaching for radio controls and sliding that HVAC knob up and down. My wife drives a 92 S-10 and the flashbacks are unmerciful. You also eliminate the regular versus extended configurations of the body. Hey, get another 1-1/2 feet of cargo floor if your gonna buy, I say! I can only say from what I've driven: the '98 was a true workhorse (still is, see previous post) and my '00 doesn't show any signs of slowing down. As far as the servicing goes I have heard that since these vans are the "dinosaurs" of minivans that perfect service isn't a must-have. There isn't as much to go wrong in other words. I'm with you, my next one will be a 03-04 LS (LT a little out of $ range). You can't find the combination of size (both interior/cargo and exterior manuverability) and in my situation, ground clearance with another van. | |
|
According to one "expert" it seems the newer the better... http://www.lemonaidcars.com/cgi-bin/search/proxy.pl?terms=astro&a- mp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonaidcars.com%2Ftruck-van.htm However, during the last 10" snow dump on our street, my neighbour's fairly new '00 RWD Astro got stuck trying to access the main road nearby, whereas my well-used old '94 AWD Safari had no problem. Maybe my extra clearance made the difference? |
|
|
WOW!!! Never seen 10" of snow in the South.. well, maybe if you added up all the winters....no, still don't think so. Hey, don't get me wrong, AWD has its place (ground clerance is the same, by the way) but I never see snow and I can drive my 2WD further through muddy conditions than most can take an AWD van. I think I still would have laughed at your neighbor if I was you. |
|
| I've had a '93 AWD since new, now have 104,000 on it and wouldn't buy another witout AWD. It has been excellent for traction and has never given me a single problem. Isn't too bad on gas milage either. | |
You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans
GMC Safari & Chevy Astro
GMC Safari/Chevy Astro
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2005 GMC Safari
2005 Chevrolet Astro



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats