Last post on Sep 10, 2011 at 6:16 PM
You are in the Smart Shopper
What is this discussion about?
Please note that NO solicitations are allowed in the Forums. This includes solicitations for Class Action lawsuits (contact me / my attorney / this attorney / email me, etc.) Such posts will be removed from this discussion on sight and no warning email will be sent.
#1793 of 1842 Re: redline [redline65]
Aug 17, 2005 (7:21 pm)
unfortunately my losses were much more substantial...never been through something like this before...net, net what does anyone think our chances are of getting some of our money back? My contract was paid in full, and it appears from the ruling (which I just read) that class 3 (WGVSC) claiments have a pretty good shot...just don't know.
Aug 22, 2005 (12:14 pm)
"Class actions suits rarely benefit anyone but lawyers....they get millions and you get a $20 coupon towards something. Did you try legal action on your own?? "
Or in the case of Jiffy Lube, you get $5 coupon
#1795 of 1842 Re: redline [cadillacmike]
Aug 22, 2005 (12:16 pm)
" Or in the case of Jiffy Lube, you get $5 coupon "
And in the AT&T case, you get an AT&T calling card......Oh boy..
#1796 of 1842 Status of the WG Web-sites
Dec 15, 2005 (7:33 pm)
Does anybody know whether the WG News web-site and the WG Creditor's Committee web-site are still live web-sites? Nothing has been changed on the former since last April, and on the latter since last August. I just tried to post something on the latter and failed. I received an error message "FrontPage Error", whatever that means.
#1797 of 1842 Re: Status of the WG Web-sites [stargazer1]
Dec 16, 2005 (1:46 pm)
I've been trying to post to the Creditor's site and get the same error - I've written to the administrator, but no response.....there is updated info (Oct, 2005) on www.nwig.com however.
#1798 of 1842 Re: Status of the WG Web-sites [skhori]
Dec 16, 2005 (2:04 pm)
Thank you. I know about the updated info on the other site. I just wish I understood what that info really means to us. That info (and questions about it)was what I was trying to post on the WG Creditor's Committee Web-Site, and it wouldn't accept either that post or an e-mail message to the Committee. I guess they're just going to leave us all out in the cold while they spend all of the available funds on themselves.
#1799 of 1842 Re: Status of the WG Web-sites [stargazer1]
Dec 16, 2005 (4:07 pm)
" I guess they're just going to leave us all out in the cold while they spend all of the available funds on themselves. "
Yep, time to learn from this experience and move on. I've been preaching to never buy anything but a manufacturer backed warranty at every chance I get.
#1800 of 1842 Re: Status of the WG Web-sites [mikefm58]
Dec 16, 2005 (4:16 pm)
And what if the manufacturer will go belly up?
#1801 of 1842 Re: Status of the WG Web-sites [yurakm]
Dec 16, 2005 (4:22 pm)
" And what if the manufacturer will go belly up? "
You're right, nothing is 100%. Ever hear of Daewoo? Any warranty is only as good as the company standing behind it.
But who would you feel safer with, Toyota / GM / Ford / Honda / Chrysler or someone like Warranty Gold / Warranty Direct / Auto Direct?
#1802 of 1842 Re: Status of the WG Web-sites [mikefm58]
Dec 16, 2005 (4:43 pm)
Absolutely agree: GM is better than WG. However, well known companies, like GE, used to be in the 3-rd part warranty business. I probably would prefer GE to GM as today.