Sign In Join 



Car Commercials The good, the bad, and the annoying!

3500 messages,  Last post on Aug 06, 2009 at 3:28 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Car Buying


Messages Page 310 of 350
1
...
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
...
350
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3090 of 3500
oh the 80s... by carlisimo
Nov 02, 2006 (12:17 am)
Reply
Datsun's "black gold" ad - the epitome of manliness
#3091 of 3500
Tempo... by andre1969
Nov 02, 2006 (5:35 am)
Reply
one thing to keep in mind is that in 1984, the EPA rated cars differently. I think they just published their raw, unadjusted test numbers, which were much more optimistic than what most people were really getting. For 1985 they adjusted them down to a more realistic number. That year, it was EPA rated at 25/34 with the 5-speed manual and 25/29 with the automatic, which was a 3-speed with no OD. There was a Diesel 5-speed that was rated at 36/44.
 
My stepdad bought a 1984 Tempo brand new. I remember driving it once. I hated it with a passion. It was slow, and for being a small car it just didn't feel very nimble. At the time my regular car was a 1980 Malibu coupe with a V-6, hardly a musclecar, but it felt like a rocket compared to that Tempo! Actually felt more responsive too, when it came to handling, cornering, and such.
 
As for popularity, the Tempo was a pretty strong seller its first few years out. In 1985 it was one of the top ten selling car nameplates in America. It fell off fast though, especially once the Japanese competition started getting larger. The Corsica/Beretta, which were wildly popular for their first few years, probably stole a lot of Tempo sales, as did Chrysler's increasingly wide array of K-car permutations.
 
It seems like whenever they came out with that restyle, which I think was in 1988, the car was pretty much relegated to rental fleets and bargain-basement buyers. I had a friend from middle school whose Dad actually bought two of the things! He was well-off financially but tended to really cheap out when it came to cars. They lived in what was once the nicest neighborhood around at the time, but in 1983-84 were driving a 1972 Satellite wagon and a 1971 or so Comet coupe. Last time I saw his Dad around 1990 or so, they had "upgraded" to ~1988 Tempos.
 
I hated my stepdad's Tempo with a passion, but it actually did make it to about 160,000 miles on its original driveline, when they traded it for a 1991 Stanza. It had other problems I'm sure, but the driveline was actually pretty solid. Ford had two different 2.3 4-cylinders back then. They had an OHC unit sourced from Brazil that was used in cars like the Pinto, Mustang, and Fairmont, and turbo'ed for cars like the T-bird, but for some reason in the Tempo they just took an old Falcon pushrod 6 and chopped two cylinders off!
#3092 of 3500
Tire commercials...car...same thing. by jipster
Nov 02, 2006 (6:23 am)
Reply
Can't really understand the direction tire commercials have taken lately. It use to be about safety, mileage , and performance... actual video of "real life" tires would be shown. Now you have a bunch of scantily clad young women and men dancing cheek to cheek in the rain.
 
I guess the next thing we will see, is some commercial where the Michelin Man is walking down a beach wearing a thong and holding hands with a Hooters girl. Who knows.
#3093 of 3500
Re: oh the 80s... [carlisimo] by fintail
Nov 02, 2006 (8:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: carlisimo (Nov 02, 2006 12:17 am)

LOL that's hilarious, indeed like an SNL commercial parody. Wow, what an ugly time.
 
Shamefully, I will admit I kind of like those primitive LED warning lights though.
#3094 of 3500
Re: Tempo... [andre1969] by fintail
Nov 02, 2006 (8:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 02, 2006 5:35 am)

I remember the 2.3 in the one we had was labeled "HSC", although I don't recall what it meant.
 
It really was a non-performing car. I am pretty sure my fintail could easily dust it in almost any performance measure, and get almost the same mileage to boot. But for those dark days of domestics...it wasn't the worst thing I guess.
#3095 of 3500
Don't hold me to it... by andre1969
Nov 02, 2006 (9:14 am)
Reply
but I want to say that "HSC" meant "High Swirl Combustion?" or maybe it was "Carburetion"?
#3096 of 3500
Re: Don't hold me to it... [andre1969] by fintail
Nov 02, 2006 (9:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 02, 2006 9:14 am)

That rings a bell, something about "swirl". The car was FI, so I hope it wasn't 'carburetion'.
#3097 of 3500
Re: oh the 80s... [carlisimo] by ateixeira
Nov 02, 2006 (11:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: carlisimo (Nov 02, 2006 12:17 am)

Black Gold was awful. The car had become a caricature of itself by then, bloated and overpriced.
 
That must've appealed to the gold chain set, I guess.
 
-juice
#3098 of 3500
Good lord... by andre1969
Nov 02, 2006 (11:43 am)
Reply
that '88 Regal ad brings back some bad flashbacks! And now that danged jingle is going to be stuck in my mind for awhile.
 
Must...get it....out!
 
Maybe I can get it out by singing something else.
 
"Good morning America, how are you?
You may not know me, but you know my name...
I'm the car they call Cutlass Ciera...
And I know the roads from Oregon to Maine".
 
Wait, that's not helping.
#3099 of 3500
Re: Good lord... [andre1969] by lemko
Nov 02, 2006 (12:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 02, 2006 11:43 am)

I wonder if they have the Buick Park Avenue commercial from the same time? Probably used the same theme.

Messages Page 310 of 350
1
...
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
...
350
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement