Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Report Your Local Gas Prices Here
8805 messages, Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 11:25 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: bottgers (Apr 08, 2006 7:44 am) The same thing is going on with natural gas, and heating oil prices and markets. What sort of conspiracy is going on with the gold markets? Is there all of a sudden a shortage of gold? Why has the price shot up so much over the last year? |
|
|
Replying to: lemko (Apr 08, 2006 7:52 am) me: Fuel is already out-of-reach for millions in this country, and for billions of people around the world. I would then conclude that people adapt, survive, and live without it. Fuel has always only gone to those are earn a certain amount. you: Low-wage workers may just not show up for work as fuel for their vehicles would cost more than they'd make on their shift at Target or Wal-Mart. me: well I don't think many people are driving 20 or 30 miles each way to work for minimum wage; that's a poor choice. Most people live in urban/suburban areas and there are many jobs that go begging near people. Also many businesses could adjust their shifts to be longer and workers to have to come in less days - (4) 10 hour shifts than (5) 8 hr for example. |
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Apr 08, 2006 8:19 am) I like Michael Savage's idea.  For every 1 illegal alien we have here in the U.S. we get 1 barrel of oil per month for Mexico. Rocky |
|
I forgot, all you have available in Canada is the liberal media. To you, liberal probably seems normal.
|
|
|
Replying to: bottgers (Apr 08, 2006 11:34 am)  OTOH-His poll approval ratings across the board also reflect falling support, which isn't just a liberal media conspiracy.  Back to cars/gas...... Rocky |
|
 Has it reached $3.10 anywhere yet ?  Rocky |
|
|
Replying to: bottgers (Apr 08, 2006 11:34 am) The idea of the "liberal media" is a sham in itself, a distraction. Who controls the media, pray tell? There's no conspiracy or anything else the neandercons try to fool the masses with. What do you want, everything to be like FOX News? Fair and balanced! ROFL But yeah, everything is on the up and up, it's all hunky-dory. Be positive! |
|
|
|
|
the one barrel of oil for every illegal here from down south would only start to make up for the Uncle Sam deficit in that deal. That is forward thinking, though.
|
|
|
Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Apr 08, 2006 12:35 pm)  Rocky |
|
|
... that some espouse in this forum, I also don't think fat-cat oil company execs sit around smoking big cigars and figuring out ways to jack up the price of gas just enough to stay beneath the "outrage" threshold. If this were the case, how did they "let" prices get as low as 80 cents a gallon as recently as 1999? Similarly, I don't think it's time for a rerun of the French Revolution, bringing out the guillotines and slaughtering the ruling elite. However, it does appear some kind of comeuppance will occur in the November elections. The problem is in the mirror. We sat on our hands for over 30 years, hoping the looming oil shortfall would fade away like a bad dream. Now world demand is rising rapidly, what with the Chinese rapidly moving to the automobile -- and why shouldn't they? After all, we Americans been driving cars for a hundred years. (It's like us sitting on thousands of nuclear weapons and telling other countries they can't build them also -- not that I think Iran or North Korea should.) We passed the CAFE law way back in 1975, setting the average fuel economy rating for cars at 27.5 mpg, which was achieved in 1985, bounced around for a few years between that figure and 26 mpg, and finally back to 27.5 in 1990, where it's been ever since. Meanwhile light trucks (including pickups, vans, and SUVs) had their own much lower standard, and until very recently, little serious attempt was made to improve their required efficiency. During these 30 years, pickups have ballooned up from a typical 3500 pounds for a C/K 10, F-100, or D/W-100 work truck to around 5000 pounds for your garden variety Silverado, F-150, and Ram 1500 (V8 extended cab, with 2WD). SUVs have mushroomed from a small segment dedicated to sportsmen, farmers, ranchers, miners, forest service workers, etc. to as fintail so aptly puts it, "vacuous trophy wives" who drive(?) their leather-lined cocoons for their "look at me" factor. While large comfy sedans can now get an honest 26, 28, or even 30+ mpg when driven at sensible speeds on the highway, the big pickups and midsize and larger SUVs can't realistically get out of the teens; that is, no better than the mastodon cars we were driving in the 70s. Then there's the insane horsepower race -- gains in engine efficiency were squandered on ever increasing amounts of power instead of better fuel economy. Why do we need 300 horsepower Calibers, for example (SRT4 version)? The most fuel-efficient vehicle fleet was produced for the 1987 model year -- it's been downhill since. Finally, people are driving at speeds on the highway that would have been considered suicidal twenty or so years ago. I had a tour bus (a stupid tour bus, of all things) ride up on my rear and flash its brights at me for having the audacity to go 65 mph (the speed limit) in the far right lane of an interstate. Even the SLOW lane isn't slow anymore. I'm old enough to remember when I could get into the left lane of the PA Turnpike at 65 mph and pass a whole line of vehicles without having someone bear down on my rear. I also remember that cars routinely passed trucks -- and tour buses -- not the other way around. We were warned -- many times, but we did nothing. Now the outrage. What to do? Short term, if you can, drive less and carpool. I never thought it would happen, but 3 guys at my workplace started carpooling back in the Katrina panic days, and have stuck with it. Hybrids and clean diesels will help in the short term also. I think ethanol from corn is a joke for cost and efficiency reasons, and hydrogen and fuel cells are a pipe dream. Does anyone know if ethanol made from switchgrass or plant stalks would be less energy-intensive (although it'd still be less efficient -- we'd need bigger fuel tanks to get the same range.) Ok, enough for now, flame away!
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Report Your Local Gas Prices Here
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
