You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Mazda Miata Mazda MX-5 Miata (2005 and earlier)

Mazda MX-5 Miata (2005 and earlier)

4340 messages,  Last post on Aug 25, 2009 at 9:51 AM

You are in the Mazda Miata Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Mazda, Toyota MR2 Spyder, Mazda MX-5 Miata, Convertible

Messages Page 57 of 435 1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 435 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#554 of 4340 melody1234 by kernick Aug 13, 2000 (12:11 am)
Buy a 2000; I don't want too much demand for the 2001's. That's a joke. Let's first talk money. If not an issue the 2001 sounds like it's got some improvements. I think everyone expects the next year's car to be better. This will cost you closer to MSRP, than the end of the year prices on the 2000's. Here in the Boston area I've seen them advertised starting at $16,995. I don't see that much styling difference between the 2. I like the integrated headlights over those from years ago. I hear the 2001's are lighter and more powerful. Maybe more comfortable seats (the truth of that is in the rear of the beholder). Most of that info is what I read and saw on miata.net.
#555 of 4340 90%/60% by karl1973 Aug 13, 2000 (1:08 am)
You may have read it on edmunds. The basic idea, is that a Miata can be driven about 9/10 in daily life, while a Corvette/M Roadster/Porsche/etc can only be driven to about 6/10 in daily life. And I think I read somewhere that the Canadian plants that build the F-body now are going to be converted to building, what else, trucks. (sounds familiar?? Anyone remember the Caprice/Roadmaster/Impala SS?)
#556 of 4340 more on 60% - 90% by pinecrestjim Aug 13, 2000 (12:38 pm)
Pure_evil probably read that comment here in Edmunds under the 2000 Miata reviewer's comments, which were... "In our opinion, you can utilize 90 percent of the Miata's abilities under normal driving conditions, while a BMW Z3 2.8 driver is lucky to experience 60 percent of that car's potential most of the time. From this perspective, the Miata is a better value and the reason why it continues to be on Edmunds.com's Most Wanted list." I was comparing the two vehicles myself before buying the '00SE. I drove both - the Z3 before the Miata. There was no hesitation for me afterwards. I'll admit that the BMW curves (and badge) look good, and the car definitely will outrun the Miata on a straight track, but the difference in cost between the two vehicles for one looking for some weekend fun just could not be justified. I'm most satisfied with my decision.
#557 of 4340 % of ability cont'd by freddy_k Aug 14, 2000 (4:56 pm)
The 90% must be derived from the regular Miata. The upgraded suspension and larger rims has a much higher limit then the base model. The beauty of this is that you hava a choice when you buy the car, something fun, where end performance soesn't matter as long as you can have a blast at relatively legal speeds, or something you can race and really perform in.
#558 of 4340 by locke2c Aug 14, 2000 (10:20 pm)
Anyone driving to 90% of their own or the car's ability (two separate measures, the former being lower 95% of the time) on public streets is a fool. Especially in a miata, the limits are very high once you get rid of the stock dogmeat tires. -Colin
#559 of 4340 Tires by karl1973 Aug 15, 2000 (6:41 pm)
The Michelins on my Miata were replaced with Toyos T1-S about 2 months ago. That was after about 23k miles. There were still considerable threads left on them, but wet weather performance was getting scary. For the record, I don't drive like a maniac in the wet, but the tires were hydroplaning like crazy. There were some people who have no problem with the OEM Michelins, and then there are others who feel like they were terrible wet weather tires. Granted they are "high performance" tires, but the new Toyos are much better in wet weather.
#560 of 4340 by locke2c Aug 15, 2000 (7:08 pm)
I despise the Michelin Pilot SX-GT. There are some folks that just love them though. Even if you love them, no way should you buy another set at $140 or so each. There are many better tires for half as much, or less. -Colin
#561 of 4340 Pilot's by zaq Aug 16, 2000 (3:10 pm)
I would proudly stand up as one of the many that detest the SX-GT's... The miata is no torque dripping muscle car but in the wet you can light up the rear end all the way into third gear. If those things even hint at lasting 20,000 miles I'll be on new rubber next year, worn or not. Since I've only put 7,000 miles on my car in 13 months... I don't relish another two years on these hockey pucks.
#562 of 4340 Michelin tire costs by pinecrestjim Aug 16, 2000 (8:15 pm)
If I spec'ed the right size, Sears was advertising the Michelin Pilot tires at $79.99 ea. this past Saturday in S. FLA. What's so wrong with the Pilots? I've always run Michelins (except for the stock tires) and have never had any problems with any of their tires. Admittedly, all my previous vehicles were 4 dr. land yachts. Then, too, I don't plan to do any racing. Hopefully not related to the Pilots on my '00SE, I had a 62+mph vibration which I thought was due to balancing problems. The local dealer checked the setup, told me the tire pressures were all wrong, corrected same and gave the car back to me. That was 5 weeks ago. Last night I checked the pressures and found all 4 at 20psi! Needless to say, they're back up to 26 as per Mazda specs. I hope the vibration hasn't returned. One thing I cannot live with is tire vibration! Jim M.
#563 of 4340 26 PSI? by hugobecker Aug 17, 2000 (1:32 am)
I'm running the Pilots 32 PSI F/R (00 LS). One thing about the Pilots, they can't be as bad as the Firerocks I had on another car.

Messages Page 57 of 435 1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 435 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Mazda Miata Mazda MX-5 Miata (2005 and earlier)